ArticleThe Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management2021
Early Experience with High-density Electroanatomical Mapping Using the Rhythmia™ Mapping System in Congenital and Pediatric Heart Disease.
Article in The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 3D Electroanatomical Mapping for Complex Atrial Arrhythmias in Adult Congenital Heart Disease-A Single Center Experience.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Rhythmia™ system (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) facilitates the rapid acquisition of high-resolution electroanatomical and activation maps. However, there are limited data on its efficacy and safety in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease (CHD) patients. In a retrospective, observational cohort study, adult CHD and pediatric patients followed by pediatric cardiology underwent electrophysiologic study using the Rhythmia™ electroanatomic mapping system. Variables examined included the number of electroanatomical maps required, acquisition time, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dosage, and rate of recurrent arrhythmia. Twelve consecutive patients, including six male patients (50%), were included with an average age of 27.7 years (range: 11-64 years). Seven (58%) of these patients had a diagnosis of CHD [moderate complexity in two (17%) and great complexity in five patients (42%)] and 10 (83%) patients underwent ablation. A total of 37 high-density maps were created in 12 procedures, with a median of 8,140 mapping points, taking a median of 631 seconds. The median procedure time was 189.5 minutes. The median fluoroscopy time was 0.9 minutes, with eight (67%) patients receiving no fluoroscopy at all. Recurrence occurred in one patient (8%) over a median follow-up duration of 16 months (interquartile range: 12.8-17.3 months). No adverse periprocedural events were recorded. This study suggests the use of high-density electroanatomic mapping in adult CHD patients showed potential for rapid acquisition of highly detailed maps with minimal fluoroscopy time or risk of periprocedural events in the studied population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.