ArticleChina CDC weekly2020
Global Trends and Regional Differences in Hepatitis C Virus Infection Prevalence and Implications for Prevention - Worldwide, 1990-2017.
Article in China CDC weekly, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Retrospective Description of Pediatric Hepatitis C in a Romanian Cohort: Liver Fibrosis at Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- First Do No Harm? Modeling Risks and Benefits of Challenge Trials for Hepatitis C Vaccine Development.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023Article
- Global, Regional, and National Trends in Incidence and Mortality of Primary Liver Cancer and Its Underlying Etiologies from 1990 to 2019: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2023Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir as a Hepatitis C Virus Infection Salvage Therapy in the Real World: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2022Article
- Article
- Asian Burden of Liver Cancer 1990-2021 and Predictions to 2040: An Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC?: The global prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in 2015 has been modeled to assess the disease burden in 21 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) regions. However, there is no study to clarify the global long-term trends and regional differences in HCV infection prevalence. WHAT IS ADDED BY THIS REPORT?: This report clarified the global temporal trends and regional differences in HCV infection prevalence. Global HCV infection age-standardized prevalence rate (ASR) gradually decreased from 1990 to 2017 except in Eastern Europe, and liver cancer due to hepatitis C ASR increased worldwide with drastic shifts in low-middle Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) regions in the last decade. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE?: HCV is still prevalent worldwide despite the development of highly effective direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and showed a reemergence concurrent with the opioid crisis. HCV infection prevention might involve at least 3 aspects: first, prohibiting HCV widespread transmission among general populations; second, increasing global DAAs coverage; and third, continuously investing in the development of the HCV vaccine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.