Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34594454›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2021

A Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience in CRISPR-Cas9 Experimental Design to Support Reverse Genetic Studies in

Alison Mills, Venkateswari Jaganatha, Alejandro Cortez, Michael Guzman, James M Burnette, Matthew Collin, Berenise Lopez-Lopez, Susan R Wessler, Jaimie M Van Norman, David C Nelson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fly-CURE, a multi-institutional CURE usingJournal of microbiology & biology education · 2023
    Article
  2. Fly-CURE, a Multi-institutional CURE usingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alison MillsBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.
Venkateswari JaganathaDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.
Alejandro CortezDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.
Michael GuzmanDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.
James M BurnetteCollege of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.
Matthew CollinDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.
Berenise Lopez-LopezDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.
Susan R WesslerDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.
Jaimie M Van NormanDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.
David C NelsonDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.
Carolyn G RasmussenBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene-editing tools such as CRISPR-Cas9 have created unprecedented opportunities for genetic studies in plants and animals. We designed a course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) to train introductory biology students in the concepts and implementation of gene-editing technology as well as develop their soft skills in data management and scientific communication. We present two versions of the course that can be implemented with twice-weekly meetings over a 5-week period. In the remote-learning version, students performed homology searches, designed guide RNAs (gRNAs) and primers, and learned the principles of molecular cloning. This version is appropriate when access to laboratory equipment or in-person instruction is limited, such as during closures that have occurred in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In person, students designed gRNAs, cloned CRISPR-Cas9 constructs, and performed genetic transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Students learned how to design effective gRNA pairs targeting their assigned gene with an 86% success rate. Final exams tested students' ability to apply knowledge of an unfamiliar genome database to characterize gene structure and to properly design gRNAs. Average final exam scores of ∼73% and ∼84% for in-person and remote-learning CUREs, respectively, indicated that students met learning outcomes. The highly parallel nature of the CURE makes it possible to target dozens to hundreds of genes, depending on the number of sections. Applying this approach in a sensitized mutant background enables focused reverse genetic screens for genetic suppressors or enhancers. The course can be adapted readily to other organisms or projects that employ gene editing.

Indexed as

course-based undergraduate research experienceCRISPR-Cas9CUREplant biologyremote learning

Identifiers

PMID34594454
PMCPMC8442021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.