ArticleOncology letters2021
Effect of neutropenia on survival outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab.
Article in Oncology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- TAS-102 plus bevacizumab versus TAS-102 alone for metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Trifluridine/Tipiracil plus Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from Real-World Series.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Pooled it
- A phase II study of intrapatient dose escalation of biweekly trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for colorectal cancer (E-BiTS study).ESMO open · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Real-world outcomes and prognostic factors of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter study in Spain.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- The Danish randomized trial of trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: final survival andESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- A New Era of Salvage-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Role and Clinical Significance of Circulating Tumor DNA.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Impact of TAS-102 dose reduction on severe neutropenia and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and prior chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Effect of pretreatment vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor use on the safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic impact and risk factors of severe neutropenia in the early phase of treatment with trifluridine-tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a single-center retrospective study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Impact of renal impairment on early development of severe neutropenia with trifluridine/tipiracil treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prognostic impact of severe neutropenia in colorectal cancer patients treated with TAS-102 and bevacizumab, addressing immortal-time bias.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Effects and risk factors of TAS-102 in real-world patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, EROTAS-R study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Biomarkers of Trifluridine-Tipiracil Efficacy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trifluridine (FTD)/tipiracil (TPI) plus bevacizumab (Bev) is a promising late-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a well-known predictor of FTD/TPI efficacy, whether CIN is a predictive marker of efficacy for FTD/TPI + Bev remains unclear. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of FTD/TPI + Bev and the predictive markers of its efficacy. Clinical data of patients with mCRC who received FTD/TPI + Bev at the Cancer Institute Hospital between January 2017 and August 2020 were retrospectively collected. Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety were assessed. In addition, subgroup analyses of prognostic and predictive efficacy markers were performed. In total, 94 patients (median age, 60.0 years; age range, 32-82 years; 37 men and 57 women) were included in the present study. The DCR was 44.7%, the median PFS time was 2.9 months (2.3-4.1 months) and the median OS time was 10.0 months (7.3-11.1 months). Grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment occurred in 27.7% of patients, which was significantly associated with a longer PFS time than those who did not develop CIN [3.8 months (2.3-8.4 months) vs. 2.7 months (1.8-4.0 months); P=0.008]. Furthermore, the DCR was higher in patients with grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment than those without CIN (61.5 vs. 38.2%; P=0.07). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment are independent predictors for a longer PFS time (P=0.01). Taken together, the results of the present study suggest that grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment are early predictors of the efficacy of FTD/TPI + Bev.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.