ArticleStem cells international2021
Severity Assessment of COVID-19 Using a CT-Based Radiomics Model.
Article in Stem cells international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of potential severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients based on CT radiomics: A retrospective study.Medical physics · 2022Trial
- Development of a radiomics-based model using computed tomography imaging to assess the incidence of extrapulmonary organ involvement inFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- An analysis of retracted COVID-19 articles published by one medical publisher with multiple journals.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2024Article
- Retracted: Severity Assessment of COVID-19 Using a CT-Based Radiomics Model.Stem cells international · 2023Article
- Wavelet transformation can enhance computed tomography texture features: a multicenter radiomics study for grade assessment of COVID-19 pulmonary lesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-14Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/667E8CFA2FF3D5EE88EA0172BD951F
- Retracted
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) has evolved into a worldwide pandemic. Although CT is sensitive in detecting lesions and assessing their severity, these works mainly depend on radiologists' subjective judgment, which is inefficient in case of a large-scale outbreak. This work focuses on developing a CT-based radiomics model to assess whether COVID-19 patients are in the early, progressive, severe, or absorption stages of the disease. We retrospectively analyzed the CT images of 284 COVID-19 patients. All of the patients were divided into four groups (0-3): early (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.