Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34594362›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

Genetic Diversity of 17 Autochthonous Italian Chicken Breeds and Their Extinction Risk Status.

Dominga Soglia, Stefano Sartore, Emiliano Lasagna, Cesare Castellini, Filippo Cendron, Francesco Perini, Martino Cassandro, Margherita Marzoni, Nicolaia Iaffaldano, Arianna Buccioni and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Dominga SogliaDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Stefano SartoreDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Emiliano LasagnaDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Cesare CastelliniDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Filippo CendronDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), Università di Padova, Viale dell'Università, Legnaro, Italy.
Francesco PeriniDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Martino CassandroDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), Università di Padova, Viale dell'Università, Legnaro, Italy.
Margherita MarzoniDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Nicolaia IaffaldanoDipartimento Agricoltura, Ambiente e Alimenti, Università degli Studi del Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Arianna BuccioniDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali, Università di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Sihem DabbouCenter Agriculture Food Environment (C3A), University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Annelisse CastilloDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Sandra MaioneDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Chiara BianchiDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Margherita ProfitiDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Paola SacchiDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Silvia CeroliniDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.
Achille SchiavoneDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Padua · ITFondazione Edmund Mach · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Molise · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preservation of genetic variability of autochthonous poultry breeds is crucial in global biodiversity. A recent report revealed small breed size and potential risk of extinction of all native Italian poultry breeds; therefore, a correct assessment of their genetic diversity is necessary for a suitable management of their preservation. In this work, we provided an overview of the contribution to poultry biodiversity of some Italian autochthonous breeds reared in conservation centers devoted to local biodiversity preservation. The level of genetic diversity, molecular kinship, inbreeding, contribution to overall genetic diversity, and rate of extinction of each breed were analyzed with a set of 14 microsatellite loci in 17 autochthonous chicken breeds. To evaluate genetic variability, total number (Na), and effective number (Ne) of alleles, observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosity, and

Indexed as

conservationgenetic resourcesgenetic variabilitylocal poultry breedsmicrosatellites

Identifiers

PMID34594362
PMCPMC8477013
OpenAlexW3200929062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.