Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34594342›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2021

Differential DNA Damage Response of Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Populations.

Kerstin Felgentreff, Catharina Schuetz, Ulrich Baumann, Christian Klemann, Dorothee Viemann, Simona Ursu, Eva-Maria Jacobsen, Klaus-Michael Debatin, Ansgar Schulz, Manfred Hoenig and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deciphering the aging process through single-cell cytometric technologies.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kerstin FelgentreffDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Catharina SchuetzDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Ulrich BaumannDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergy and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Christian KlemannDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergy and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Dorothee ViemannDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergy and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Simona UrsuCore Facility Cytometry, Ulm University Medical Faculty, Ulm, Germany.
Eva-Maria JacobsenDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Klaus-Michael DebatinDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Ansgar SchulzDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Manfred HoenigDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Klaus SchwarzInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
University Hospital Ulm · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversität Ulm · DEGerman Red Cross · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage occurs constantly in every cell triggered by endogenous processes of replication and metabolism, and external influences such as ionizing radiation and intercalating chemicals. Large sets of proteins are involved in sensing, stabilizing and repairing this damage including control of cell cycle and proliferation. Some of these factors are phosphorylated upon activation and can be used as biomarkers of DNA damage response (DDR) by flow and mass cytometry. Differential survival rates of lymphocyte subsets in response to DNA damage are well established, characterizing NK cells as most resistant and B cells as most sensitive to DNA damage. We investigated DDR to low dose gamma radiation (2Gy) in peripheral blood lymphocytes of 26 healthy donors and 3 patients with ataxia telangiectasia (AT) using mass cytometry. γH2AX, p-CHK2, p-ATM and p53 were analyzed as specific DDR biomarkers for functional readouts of DNA repair efficiency in combination with cell cycle and T, B and NK cell populations characterized by 20 surface markers. We identified significant differences in DDR among lymphocyte populations in healthy individuals. Whereas CD56

Indexed as

DNA DamageAtaxia TelangiectasiaAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCell CycleCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCell SurvivalCheckpoint Kinase 2Flow CytometryHistonesHumansLymphocyte SubsetsPhenotypePhosphorylationAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanBiomarkersCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, humanH2AX protein, humanHistonesTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53ataxia telangiectasiacell cycleDNA damage responsemass cytometryperipheral blood lymphocyte subsets

Identifiers

PMID34594342
PMCPMC8478158
OpenAlexW3201394613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.