Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34594163›Full record

ArticlePopulation, space and place2021

Measuring migration motives with open-ended survey data: Methodological and conceptual issues.

Brian Joseph Gillespie, Clara H Mulder, Casey M Eggleston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population, space and place, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Local Ties as Self-Reported Constraints to Internal Migration in Spain.European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian Joseph GillespiePopulation Research Centre, Faculty of Spatial Sciences University of Groningen Groningen Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2997-7179
Clara H MulderPopulation Research Centre, Faculty of Spatial Sciences University of Groningen Groningen Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0152-2225
Casey M EgglestonCenter for Behavioral Science Methods U.S. Census Bureau Suitland MD USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motives for migration are difficult to measure. Open-ended data collection can be an attractive option, but also comes with pitfalls. We use the "Motives for Migration" survey on internal migration in Sweden to identify some of these pitfalls. We identify five categories of methodological issues: how the respondents-and we-dealt with multiple motives for migration; who the motive pertained to (i.e., the respondents themselves or someone else in the household); whether the motive was related to a status or an event; which third-party person(s) the respondent meant to refer to; and which geographical unit the motive pertained to. We also identify two conceptual issues: (1) the distinction between reasons for moving and location choice and (2) the distinction between moving "from" and moving "to" somewhere. We present some suggestions that will be useful for future attempts to study the topic and possibly such other topics as motives for immigration, getting married, or leaving the parental home.

Indexed as

migrationmotivessurvey methods

Identifiers

PMID34594163
PMCPMC8459254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.