Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34594135›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2021

Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Penile Cancer Using Clinicopathological Factors and Nomograms.

Yanxiang Shao, Xiang Tu, Yang Liu, Yige Bao, Shangqing Ren, Zhen Yang, Xu Hu, Kan Wu, Hao Zeng, Qiang Wei and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanxiang Shao *Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Xiang Tu *Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Yang Liu *Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Yige BaoDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Shangqing RenDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Zhen YangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Xu HuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4306-4656
Kan WuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Hao ZengDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Qiang WeiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Xiang LiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8471-0015
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the predictive factors of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and evaluate the usefulness of prediction nomograms.

methodsThis study included 300 patients diagnosed with penile squamous cell carcinoma at West China Hospital (WCH) of Sichuan University (Chengdu, China) and 412 cases acquired from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Logistic regression analysis was performed on these cohorts to investigate the predictive factors of LNM. We evaluated a recently developed prediction nomogram for LNM, which was established based on the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Moreover, we developed a novel nomogram using cases from the WCH for the prediction of lymphatic metastasis.

resultsLogistic analysis identified that younger age at diagnosis, invasion of the penis body, poorer pT stage, cN stage, nuclear grade and the presence of lymph vascular invasion (LVI) were significantly correlated with LNM in WCH cases; however, only race, poorer T stage and cN stage were significantly associated with LNM among the cases from the SEER. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that younger age, poorer T stage, cN stage and nuclear grade were independent predictors of LNM. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of WCH cases showed that the tumor T stage 8th edition has better area under the curve than 7th stage (0.672 vs 0.636, respectively). Moreover, well AUC was seen in external validation of NCDB nomogram in WCH cohorts and SEER series (0.833 vs 0.795). The new nomogram included the aforementioned independent predictors and the bootstrap-corrected concordance was 0.876.

conclusionYounger diagnose age, poorer pT stage, cN stage, nuclear grade and LVI were the most important predictors of LNM in patients with penile cancer. 8th T stage performed better than 7th version in predicting LNM. NCDB nomogram has some application values in both WCH and SEER cases, and our novel model further improved the predictive accuracy.

Indexed as

lymph node metastasisnomogrampenile cancerprediction modelSEER

Identifiers

PMID34594135
PMCPMC8478162
OpenAlexW3204194148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.