ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Radiographic evaluation of osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral capitellum: A systematic review.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interrater agreement for characterization of capitellar osteochondritis dissecans using photon-counting computed tomography technology.JSES international · 2026Article
- [Bone-cartilage transfer for osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral capitellum].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2024Article
- MRI Features That Contribute to Decision-Making for Treatment of Capitellar OCD Lesions: An Expert Consensus Using the Delphi Method.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Elbow in Overhead Athletes: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Osteochondritis dissecans of the temporomandibular joint: a scoping review.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2024Article
- Preoperative Evaluation and Surgical Simulation for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Elbow Using Three-Dimensional MRI-CT Image Fusion Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate radiographic-based classification systems for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the capitellum and determine their agreement with intraoperative findings.
methodsUsing PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed 44 studies utilizing a total of 19 classification systems.
resultsMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based systems showed better predictive value of intraoperative staging, and the Itsubo and Kohyama classifications showed best predictive value for lesion stability.
conclusionsNo classification system effectively correlated with intraoperative findings. A combination of radiograph, MRI, and computed tomography will most accurately determine OCD lesion stability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Systematic Review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.