ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2021
Scoring system for activation of critical care air transport team for aeromedical evacuation.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur hospital began work on formulating its own critical care air transport team (CCATT) and patient transfer unit (PTU) in 2007. A total of 293 patients have been evacuated by air using the various models of the PTU from April 2008 to February 2017. This study has been undertaken to formulate a protocol for activation of CCATT for aeromedical evacuation that best suits our setup keeping in view the availability of electromedical equipment, manpower and aircrafts.
methodsThe study is a cross-sectional study involving patients who were air evacuated between January 2010 to February 2017. Statistical analysis tests were performed to compare and analyze the two scoring systems to find out the sensitivity and specificity of the two scoring systems and to find out the degree of agreement.
resultsThe data using each scoring system were compared with actual requirement of CCATT based on recommendation of team leader of each CCATT mission and available data of each patient. It was observed that the old scoring system showed poor agreement with kappa coefficient of 0.162. The new scoring system based on modified early warning physiological score showed good agreement with kappa coefficient of 0.895.
conclusionCCATT can be activated by peripheral medical echelons based on objective criteria rather than subjective ones so that optimal use of resources can be carried out not only in peace time but also during mass casualty scenarios such as natural calamities or war.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.