Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34594043›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2022

Differential abundance testing on single-cell data using k-nearest neighbor graphs.

Emma Dann, Neil C Henderson, Sarah A Teichmann, Michael D Morgan, John C Marioni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 553 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
553citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

553 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

493 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma DannWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7400-7438
Neil C HendersonCentre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sarah A TeichmannWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6294-6366
Michael D MorganEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. michael.morgan@cruk.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-0711
John C MarioniWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. marioni@ebi.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9092-0852

Funding

Cancer Research UK A22231Cancer Research UK C9545/A29580Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust 206194Wellcome Trust 219542Wellcome Trust 219542/Z/19/ZWellcome Trust WT206194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current computational workflows for comparative analyses of single-cell datasets typically use discrete clusters as input when testing for differential abundance among experimental conditions. However, clusters do not always provide the appropriate resolution and cannot capture continuous trajectories. Here we present Milo, a scalable statistical framework that performs differential abundance testing by assigning cells to partially overlapping neighborhoods on a k-nearest neighbor graph. Using simulations and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data, we show that Milo can identify perturbations that are obscured by discretizing cells into clusters, that it maintains false discovery rate control across batch effects and that it outperforms alternative differential abundance testing strategies. Milo identifies the decline of a fate-biased epithelial precursor in the aging mouse thymus and identifies perturbations to multiple lineages in human cirrhotic liver. As Milo is based on a cell-cell similarity structure, it might also be applicable to single-cell data other than scRNA-seq. Milo is provided as an open-source R software package at https://github.com/MarioniLab/miloR .

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsCluster AnalysisMiceSequence Analysis, RNASoftware

Identifiers

PMID34594043
PMCPMC7617075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.