Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593948›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

New chemical biopsy tool for spatially resolved profiling of human brain tissue in vivo.

Joanna Bogusiewicz, Katarzyna Burlikowska, Kamil Łuczykowski, Karol Jaroch, Marcin Birski, Jacek Furtak, Marek Harat, Janusz Pawliszyn, Barbara Bojko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Lipidomic profile of meningiomas harboring different NF2 mutation status.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Perspective onJournal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2024
    Article
  7. Acoustomechanically activatable liposomes for ultrasonic drug uncaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joanna BogusiewiczDepartment of Pharmacodynamics and Molecular Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Katarzyna BurlikowskaDepartment of Pharmacodynamics and Molecular Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Kamil ŁuczykowskiDepartment of Pharmacodynamics and Molecular Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Karol JarochDepartment of Pharmacodynamics and Molecular Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Marcin BirskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Jacek FurtakDepartment of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Marek HaratDepartment of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, Bydgoszcz, Poland. harat@10wsk.mil.pl.
Janusz PawliszynDepartment of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada. janusz@uwaterloo.ca.
Barbara BojkoDepartment of Pharmacodynamics and Molecular Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz, Poland. bbojko@cm.umk.pl.
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PLCollegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz · PLUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is extremely challenging to perform chemical analyses of the brain, particularly in humans, due to the restricted access to this organ. Imaging techniques are the primary approach used in clinical practice, but they only provide limited information about brain chemistry. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has been presented recently as a chemical biopsy tool for the study of animal brains. The current work demonstrates for the first time the use of SPME for the spatially resolved sampling of the human brain in vivo. Specially designed multi-probe sampling device was used to simultaneously extract metabolites from the white and grey matter of patients undergoing brain tumor biopsies. Samples were collected by inserting the probes along the planned trajectory of the biopsy needle prior to the procedure, which was followed by metabolomic and lipidomic analyses. The results revealed that studied brain structures were predominantly composed of lipids, while the concentration and diversity of detected metabolites was higher in white than in grey matter. Although the small number of participants in this research precluded conclusions of a biological nature, the results highlight the advantages of the proposed SPME approach, as well as disadvantages that should be addressed in future studies.

Indexed as

Brain ChemistryBiopsyBrainChromatography, LiquidHumansLipidomicsMass SpectrometryMetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID34593948
PMCPMC8484280
OpenAlexW3201740150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.