Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593932›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Presence of distinctive microbiome in the first-pass meconium of newborn infants.

Jenni Turunen, Mysore V Tejesvi, Niko Paalanne, Jenni Hekkala, Outi Lindgren, Mika Kaakinen, Tytti Pokka, Anna Kaisanlahti, Justus Reunanen, Terhi Tapiainen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jenni TurunenMedical Research Center and PEDEGO Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. jenni.turunen@oulu.fi.
Mysore V TejesviBiocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Niko PaalanneMedical Research Center and PEDEGO Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Jenni HekkalaBiocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Outi LindgrenCancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Mika KaakinenBiocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Tytti PokkaMedical Research Center and PEDEGO Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Anna KaisanlahtiBiocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Justus Reunanen *Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Terhi Tapiainen *Medical Research Center and PEDEGO Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
University of Oulu · FIOulu University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We critically evaluated the fetal microbiome concept in 44 neonates with placenta, amniotic fluid, and first-pass meconium samples. Placental histology showed no signs of inflammation. Meconium samples were more often bacterial culture positive after vaginal delivery. In next-generation sequencing of the bacterial 16S gene, before and after removal of extracellular and PCR contaminant DNA, the median number of reads was low in placenta (48) and amniotic fluid (46) and high in meconium samples (14,556 C-section, 24,860 vaginal). In electron microscopy, meconium samples showed extracellular vesicles. Utilizing the analysis of composition of microbiomes (ANCOM) against water, meconium samples had a higher relative abundance of Firmicutes, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, and Escherichia-Shigella. Our results did not support the existence of the placenta and amniotic fluid microbiota in healthy pregnancies. The first-pass meconium samples, formed in utero, appeared to harbor a microbiome that may be explained by perinatal colonization or intrauterine colonization via bacterial extracellular vesicles.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAmniotic FluidBacteriaCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricExtracellular VesiclesFemaleFinlandHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMeconiumPlacentaPregnancyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID34593932
PMCPMC8484610
OpenAlexW3201713180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.