Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593924›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

The effects of different frequencies of rhythmic acoustic stimulation on gait stability in healthy elderly individuals: a pilot study.

Roberta Minino, Emahnuel Troisi Lopez, Pierpaolo Sorrentino, Rosaria Rucco, Anna Lardone, Matteo Pesoli, Domenico Tafuri, Laura Mandolesi, Giuseppe Sorrentino, Marianna Liparoti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Inducing asymmetric gait in healthy walkers: a review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberta Minino *Department of Motor Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
Emahnuel Troisi Lopez *Department of Motor Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
Pierpaolo SorrentinoInstitut de Neuroscience des Systemès, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Rosaria RuccoDepartment of Motor Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
Anna LardoneDepartment of Social and Developmental Psychology, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Matteo PesoliDepartment of Motor Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
Domenico TafuriDepartment of Motor Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
Laura MandolesiDepartment of Humanities Studies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe SorrentinoDepartment of Motor Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy. giuseppe.sorrentino@uniparthenope.it.
Marianna LiparotiDepartment of Motor Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
Parthenope University of Naples · ITInstitut de Neurosciences des Systèmes · FRInstitute of Applied Science and Intelligent Systems · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of rhythmic acoustic stimulation (RAS) to improve gait and balance in healthy elderly individuals is controversial. Our aim was to investigate, through 3D gait analysis, the effect of different types of RAS (fixed frequency and based on subject-specific cadence), using conventional gait parameters and the trunk displacement as readouts. Walking at a fixed frequency of 80 bpm, the subjects showed extended duration of gait cycle and increased gait variability while the same individuals, walking at a fixed frequency of 120 bpm, showed reduced trunk sway and gait cycle duration. With regard to the RAS at subject-specific frequencies, walking at 90% of the subject-specific average cadence did not significantly modify the gait parameters, except for the speed, which was reduced. In contrast, walking at 100% and 110% of the mean cadence caused increased stride length and a slight reduction of temporal parameters and trunk sway. In conclusion, this pilot study shows that using RAS at fixed frequencies might be an inappropriate strategy, as it is not adjusted to individual gait characteristics. On the other hand, RAS frequencies equal to or slightly higher than each subject's natural cadence seem to be beneficial for gait and stability.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationGaitAgedAged, 80 and overBody Weights and MeasuresFemaleGait AnalysisGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsWalkingWalking Speed

Identifiers

PMID34593924
PMCPMC8484542
OpenAlexW3204359047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.