ArticleScientific reports2021
Rapid, label-free classification of tumor-reactive T cell killing with quantitative phase microscopy and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nondestructive, High-Resolution T Cell Characterization and Subtyping via Deep-UV Microscopy.BME frontiers · 2026Article
- Microscopic image-based classification of adipocyte differentiation by machine learning.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2023Article
- Touch-free optical technologies to streamline the production of T cell therapies.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative phase microscopy (QPM) enables studies of living biological systems without exogenous labels. To increase the utility of QPM, machine-learning methods have been adapted to extract additional information from the quantitative phase data. Previous QPM approaches focused on fluid flow systems or time-lapse images that provide high throughput data for cells at single time points, or of time-lapse images that require delayed post-experiment analyses, respectively. To date, QPM studies have not imaged specific cells over time with rapid, concurrent analyses during image acquisition. In order to study biological phenomena or cellular interactions over time, efficient time-dependent methods that automatically and rapidly identify events of interest are desirable. Here, we present an approach that combines QPM and machine learning to identify tumor-reactive T cell killing of adherent cancer cells rapidly, which could be used for identifying and isolating novel T cells and/or their T cell receptors for studies in cancer immunotherapy. We demonstrate the utility of this method by machine learning model training and validation studies using one melanoma-cognate T cell receptor model system, followed by high classification accuracy in identifying T cell killing in an additional, independent melanoma-cognate T cell receptor model system. This general approach could be useful for studying additional biological systems under label-free conditions over extended periods of examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.