Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593868›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Cardiac involvement in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and its incremental value in outcomes prediction.

Payam Pournazari, Alison L Spangler, Fawzi Ameer, Kobina K Hagan, Mauricio E Tano, Mohammed Chamsi-Pasha, Lakshmi H Chebrolu, William A Zoghbi, Khurram Nasir, Sherif F Nagueh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in COVID.Circulation research · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Payam PournazariHouston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, USA.
Alison L SpanglerHouston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, USA.
Fawzi AmeerHouston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, USA.
Kobina K HaganHouston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, USA.
Mauricio E TanoHouston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, USA.
Mohammed Chamsi-PashaHouston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, USA.
Lakshmi H ChebroluHouston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, USA.
William A ZoghbiHouston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, USA.
Khurram NasirHouston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, USA.
Sherif F NaguehHouston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, USA. snagueh@houstonmethodist.org.
Houston Methodist · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent reports linked acute COVID-19 infection in hospitalized patients to cardiac abnormalities. Studies have not evaluated presence of abnormal cardiac structure and function before scanning in setting of COVD-19 infection. We sought to examine cardiac abnormalities in consecutive group of patients with acute COVID-19 infection according to the presence or absence of cardiac disease based on review of health records and cardiovascular imaging studies. We looked at independent contribution of imaging findings to clinical outcomes. After excluding patients with previous left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (global and/or segmental), 724 patients were included. Machine learning identified predictors of in-hospital mortality and in-hospital mortality + ECMO. In patients without previous cardiovascular disease, LV EF < 50% occurred in 3.4%, abnormal LV global longitudinal strain (< 16%) in 24%, and diastolic dysfunction in 20%. Right ventricular systolic dysfunction (RV free wall strain < 20%) was noted in 18%. Moderate and large pericardial effusion were uncommon with an incidence of 0.4% for each category. Forty patients received ECMO support, and 79 died (10.9%). A stepwise increase in AUC was observed with addition of vital signs and laboratory measurements to baseline clinical characteristics, and a further significant increase (AUC 0.91) was observed when echocardiographic measurements were added. The performance of an optimized prediction model was similar to the model including baseline characteristics + vital signs and laboratory results + echocardiographic measurements.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedClinical Decision RulesCOVID-19EchocardiographyExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleHeart DiseasesHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID34593868
PMCPMC8484628
OpenAlexW3201800067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.