Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593854›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Tracking forest loss and fragmentation between 1930 and 2020 in Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) range in Nepal.

Ashok Kumar Ram, Nabin Kumar Yadav, Pem Narayan Kandel, Samrat Mondol, Bivash Pandav, Lakshminarayanan Natarajan, Naresh Subedi, Dipanjan Naha, C Sudhakar Reddy, Babu Ram Lamichhane

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Connecting tiger (Ecology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ashok Kumar RamWildlife Institute of India (WII), Dehradun, India. elephas.maximus@yahoo.com.
Nabin Kumar YadavMinistry of Industry, Tourism, Forests and Environment, Province 2, Janakpur, Nepal.
Pem Narayan KandelMinistry of Forests and Environment, Singhadurbar, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Samrat MondolWildlife Institute of India (WII), Dehradun, India.
Bivash PandavWildlife Institute of India (WII), Dehradun, India.
Lakshminarayanan NatarajanWildlife Institute of India (WII), Dehradun, India.
Naresh SubediNational Trust for Nature Conservation (NTNC), Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Dipanjan NahaSavannah Research Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
C Sudhakar ReddyNational Remote Sensing Centre, Indian Space Research Organization, Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500 037, India.
Babu Ram LamichhaneNational Trust for Nature Conservation (NTNC), Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal. baburaml@gmail.com.
Wildlife Institute of India · INGovernment of Nepal · NPNational Trust for Nature Conservation · NPNational Remote Sensing Centre · INUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forest cover is the primary determinant of elephant distribution, thus, understanding forest loss and fragmentation is crucial for elephant conservation. We assessed deforestation and patterns of forest fragmentation between 1930 and 2020 in Chure Terai Madhesh Lanscape (CTML) which covers the entire elephant range in Nepal. Forest cover maps and fragmentation matrices were generated using multi-source data (Topographic maps and Landsat satellite images of 1930, 1975, 2000, and 2020) and spatiotemporal change was quantified. At present, 19,069 km

Identifiers

PMID34593854
PMCPMC8484620
OpenAlexW3204160789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.