Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593791›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

High-level cognition during story listening is reflected in high-order dynamic correlations in neural activity patterns.

Lucy L W Owen, Thomas H Chang, Jeremy R Manning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. High-level cognition is supported by information-rich but compressible brain activity patterns.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Living on the edge: network neuroscience beyond nodes.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Anxiety Shapes Amygdala-Prefrontal Dynamics During Movie Watching.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Gaussian Process Model of Human Electrocorticographic Data.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucy L W OwenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1844-6011
Thomas H ChangDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Jeremy R ManningDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. jeremy.r.manning@dartmouth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7613-4732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our thoughts arise from coordinated patterns of interactions between brain structures that change with our ongoing experiences. High-order dynamic correlations in neural activity patterns reflect different subgraphs of the brain's functional connectome that display homologous lower-level dynamic correlations. Here we test the hypothesis that high-level cognition is reflected in high-order dynamic correlations in brain activity patterns. We develop an approach to estimating high-order dynamic correlations in timeseries data, and we apply the approach to neuroimaging data collected as human participants either listen to a ten-minute story or listen to a temporally scrambled version of the story. We train across-participant pattern classifiers to decode (in held-out data) when in the session each neural activity snapshot was collected. We find that classifiers trained to decode from high-order dynamic correlations yield the best performance on data collected as participants listened to the (unscrambled) story. By contrast, classifiers trained to decode data from scrambled versions of the story yielded the best performance when they were trained using first-order dynamic correlations or non-correlational activity patterns. We suggest that as our thoughts become more complex, they are reflected in higher-order patterns of dynamic network interactions throughout the brain.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAuditory PerceptionBrainCognitionConnectomeDatasets as TopicMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetNeuroimagingTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID34593791
PMCPMC8484677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.