Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593709›Full record

Trial reportMedical care2021

Examining Patients' Capacity to Use Patient Portals: Insights for Telehealth.

Ann Scheck McAlearney, Cynthia J Sieck, Megan E Gregory, Gennaro Di Tosto, Sarah R MacEwan, Matthew J DePuccio, Jennifer A Lee, Timothy R Huerta, Daniel M Walker

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ann Scheck McAlearneyDepartment of Family and Community Medicine.
Cynthia J SieckDepartment of Family and Community Medicine.
Megan E GregoryCATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking.
Gennaro Di TostoCATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking.
Sarah R MacEwanCATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking.
Matthew J DePuccioCATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking.
Jennifer A LeeDepartment of Family and Community Medicine.
Timothy R HuertaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine.
Daniel M WalkerDepartment of Family and Community Medicine.

Funding

The Institute for the Design of Environments Aligned for Patient Safety (IDEA4PS)P30HS024379 · AHRQ · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCALEARNEY, ANN SCHECK · 2015 to 2015
$4.0M
High Tech and High Touch (HT2): Transforming patient engagement through portal technology at the bedsideR01HS024091 · AHRQ · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCALEARNEY, ANN SCHECK · 2015 to 2018
$967k
Portals in Inpatient Care (PIC): Evaluating the Usability, Use and Patient Experience Associated with Patient Portal Technology at the BedsideR21HS024349 · AHRQ · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCALEARNEY, ANN SCHECK · 2015 to 2015
$299k
AHRQ HHS P30 HS024379AHRQ HHS R01 HS024091AHRQ HHS R21 HS024349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increase in telehealth in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic highlights the need to understand patients' capacity to utilize this care modality. Patient portals are a tool whose use requires similar resources and skills as those required for telehealth. Patients' capacity to use patient portals may therefore provide insight regarding patients' readiness and capacity to use telehealth.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to examine factors related to patients' capacity to use a patient portal and test the impact of these factors on patients' portal use. RESEARCH DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Using data from a large-scale pragmatic randomized controlled trial of patient portal use, 1081 hospitalized patients responded to survey items that were then mapped onto the 4 dimensions of the Engagement Capacity Framework: self-efficacy, resources, willingness, and capabilities. MEASURES: The outcome variable was frequency of outpatient portal use. We evaluated associations between Engagement Capacity Framework dimensions and patient portal use, using regression analyses.

resultsPatients with fewer resources, fewer capabilities, lower willingness, and lower overall capacity to use patient portals used the portal less; in contrast, those with lower perceived self-efficacy used the portal more.

conclusionsOur findings highlight differences in patients' capacity to use patient portals, which provide an initial understanding of factors that may influence the use of telehealth and offer important guidance in efforts to support patients' telehealth use. Offering patients training tailored to the use of telehealth tools may be particularly beneficial.

Indexed as

Patient PortalsTelemedicineAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalPatient ParticipationSelf-AssessmentSelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34593709
PMCPMC8595621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.