Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593662›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of pain2021

Predictors of discogenic pain in magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective study of provocative discography performed by posterolateral approach.

Anuj Jain, Suruchi Jain, Swapnil Kumar Barasker, Amit Agrawal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of pain, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anuj JainDepartment of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Science, Bhopal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2105-5524
Suruchi JainDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3919-4581
Swapnil Kumar BaraskerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and Post Graduate Institute, Indore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3178-0623
Amit AgrawalDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Science, Bhopal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3287-5448
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProvocative discography (PD) is a test that is useful in diagnosing discogenic pain (DP). In this study, to diagnose DP, we used a posterolateral approach of needle placement and followed pressure criteria laid down by the Spine Intervention Society. The aim was to identify the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (desiccation, high intensity zone and change in shape and size of the disc) and the results of PD.

methodsRecords of 50 patients who underwent PD for DP were analyzed. A total of 109 PDs were performed, with 54 suspect and 55 control discs. Alternate pain generators were ruled out.

resultsA total of 35 suspect discs were positive on PD. The mean disc pressure in the suspect disc was 31.9 ± 7.9 psi (range, 15-44). Of the 50 patients who underwent PD, 35 had positive MRI findings. A significant positive correlation was found only between disc desiccation and discography result (r = 0.6,

conclusionsIn patients with DP, disc desiccation is the most useful MRI feature that predicts a painful disc on PD.

Indexed as

DesiccationDiagnosisDiscographyIntervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DegenerationLow Back PainMagnetic Resonance ImagingPain ManagementSensitivity and SpecificitySpinal Diseases.

Identifiers

PMID34593662
PMCPMC8494962
OpenAlexW3203732324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.