Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593583›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2021

Readiness to Provide Antenatal Corticosteroids for Threatened Preterm Birth in Public Health Facilities in Northern India.

Ankita Kankaria, Mona Duggal, Anshul Chauhan, Debarati Sarkar, Suresh Dalpath, Akash Kumar, Gursharan Singh Dhanjal, Vijay Kumar, Vanita Suri, Rajesh Kumar and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ankita KankariaPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.
Mona DuggalPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.
Anshul ChauhanPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.
Debarati SarkarPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.
Suresh DalpathState Health System Resource Centre, Haryana, India.
Akash KumarPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.
Gursharan Singh DhanjalPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.
Vijay KumarSurvival for Women and Children (SWACH) Foundation, Panchkula, Haryana, India.
Vanita SuriPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.
Rajesh KumarPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.
Praveen KumarPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.
James A LitchGlobal Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth (GAPPS), Lynnwood, WA, USA. jim.litch@gapps.org.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INGlobal Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth · USNational Health Systems Resource Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2014, the Government of India (GOI) released operational guidelines on the use of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) in preterm labor. However, without ensuring the quality of childbirth and newborn care at facilities, the use of ACS in low- and middle-income countries is potentially harmful. This study assessed the readiness to provide ACS at primary and secondary care public health facilities in northern India.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in 37 public health facilities in 2 districts of Haryana, India. Facility processes and program implementation for ACS delivery were assessed using pretested study tools developed from the World Health Organization (WHO) quality of care standards and WHO guidelines for threatened preterm birth.

resultsKey gaps in public health facilities' process of care to provide ACS for threatened preterm birth were identified, particularly concerning evidence-based practices, competent workforce, and actionable health information system. Emphasis on accurate gestational age estimation, quality of childbirth care, and quality of preterm care were inadequate. Shortage of trained staff was widespread, and a disconnect was found between knowledge and attitudes regarding ACS use. ACS administration was provided only at district or subdistrict hospitals, and these facilities did not uniformly record ACS-specific indicators. All levels lacked a comprehensive protocol and job aids for identifying and managing threatened preterm birth.

conclusionsACS operational guidelines were not widely disseminated or uniformly implemented. Facilities require strengthened supervision and standardization of threatened preterm birth care. Facilities need greater readiness to meet required conditions for ACS use. Increasing uptake of a single intervention without supporting it with adequate quality of maternal and newborn care will jeopardize improvement in preterm birth outcomes. We recommend updating and expanding the existing GOI ACS operational guidelines to include specific actions for the safe and effective use of ACS in line with recent scientific evidence.

Indexed as

Premature BirthAdrenal Cortex HormonesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyAdrenal Cortex Hormones

Identifiers

PMID34593583
PMCPMC8514043
OpenAlexW3186351057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.