Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593565›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2021

ATHENA (GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45): a randomized, phase III trial to evaluate rucaparib as monotherapy (ATHENA-MONO) and rucaparib in combination with nivolumab (ATHENA-COMBO) as maintenance treatment following frontline platinum-based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer.

Bradley J Monk, Robert L Coleman, Keiichi Fujiwara, Michelle K Wilson, Amit M Oza, Ana Oaknin, David M O'Malley, Domenica Lorusso, Shannon N Westin, Tamar Safra and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03522246 (ATHENA), which is not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03522246 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

ATHENA (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study in Ovarian Cancer Patients Evaluating Rucaparib and Nivolumab as Maintenance Treatment Following Response to Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy)

TypeinterventionalSponsorpharmaand GmbHRan2018 to 2030Enrolled1,097ConditionsEpithelial Ovarian Cancer, Primary Peritoneal, Fallopian Tube Cancer, Newly DiagnosedArmsRucaparib, Nivolumab, Placebo Oral Tablet, Placebo IV Infusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Advances in immunotherapies in ovarian cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Bradley J MonkArizona Oncology (US Oncology Network), University of Arizona College of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA bradley.monk@usoncology.com.
Robert L ColemanUS Oncology Research, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
Keiichi FujiwaraDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7388-0243
Michelle K WilsonDepartment of Cancer and Blood, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Amit M OzaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ana OakninMedical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
David M O'MalleyDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Domenica LorussoUnità di Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and MITO, MIlan, Italy.
Shannon N WestinDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1922-0156
Tamar SafraOncology Department, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Thomas J HerzogDepartment of Ob/Gyn, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Frederik MarméGynecological Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ramez N EskanderDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Kevin K LinMolecular Diagnostics, Clovis Oncology, Inc, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Danny ShihClinical Operations, Clovis Oncology, Inc, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Sandra GobleBiostatistics, Clovis Oncology, Inc, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Nikolay GrechkoClinical Development, Clovis Oncology, Ltd, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Stephanie HumeClinical Development, Clovis Oncology, Inc, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Lara MaloneyClinical Development, Clovis Oncology, Inc, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Iain A McNeishDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Rebecca S KristeleitDepartment of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal treatment strategy for women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer has yet to be determined. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have demonstrated substantial improvement in progression-free survival as monotherapy maintenance treatment in the frontline setting versus active surveillance. Furthermore, preclinical and early clinical studies have shown that PARP inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors have synergistic antitumor activity and may provide an additional therapeutic option for patients in this population. PRIMARY

objectivesIn women with newly diagnosed ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer, we wish to assess the efficacy of frontline maintenance treatment with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib versus placebo following response to platinum-based chemotherapy (ATHENA-MONO), and to assess the combination of rucaparib plus nivolumab (a programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1)-blocking monoclonal antibody) versus rucaparib alone (ATHENA-COMBO). STUDY HYPOTHESIS: (1) Maintenance therapy with rucaparib monotherapy may extend progression-free survival following standard treatment for ovarian cancer in the frontline setting. (2) The combination of nivolumab plus rucaparib may extend progression-free survival following standard treatment for ovarian cancer in the frontline setting compared with rucaparib alone. TRIAL

designATHENA is an international, randomized, double-blind, phase III trial consisting of two independent comparisons (ATHENA-MONO and ATHENA-COMBO) in patients with newly diagnosed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Patients are randomized 4:4:1:1 to the following: oral rucaparib+ intravenous nivolumab (arm A); oral rucaparib + intravenous placebo (arm B); oral placebo+ intravenous nivolumab (arm C); and oral placebo + intravenous placebo (arm D). The starting dose of rucaparib is 600 mg orally twice a day and nivolumab 480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks. ATHENA-MONO compares arm B with arm D to evaluate rucaparib monotherapy versus placebo, and ATHENA-COMBO evaluates arm A versus arm B to investigate the effects of rucaparib and nivolumab in combination versus rucaparib monotherapy. ATHENA-MONO and ATHENA-COMBO share a common treatment arm (arm B) but each comparison is independently powered. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients ≥18 years of age with newly diagnosed advanced, high-grade epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer who have achieved a response after completion of cytoreductive surgery and initial platinum-based chemotherapy are enrolled. No other prior treatment for ovarian cancer, other than the frontline platinum regimen, is permitted. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed progression-free survival by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. SAMPLE SIZE: Approximately 1000 patients have been enrolled and randomized. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING

resultsThe trial completed accrual in 2020. While dependent on event rates, primary results of ATHENA-MONO are anticipated in early 2022 and results of ATHENA-COMBO are anticipated to mature at a later date.

trial registrationThis trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03522246).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndolesMaintenance ChemotherapyNivolumabOvarian NeoplasmsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsIndolesNivolumabPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsrucaparibBRCA1 proteinBRCA2 proteinhomologous recombinationovarian neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34593565
PMCPMC8666815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.