Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593516›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

No Evidence for Neural Overlap between Unconsciously Processed and Imagined Stimuli.

Nadine Dijkstra, Simon van Gaal, Linda Geerligs, Sander E Bosch, Marcel A J van Gerven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Spatial confidence regions for combinations of excursion sets in image analysis.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Unconscious Manipulation of Conceptual Representations with Decoded Neurofeedback Impacts Search Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nadine DijkstraDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands n.dijkstra@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1423-9277
Simon van GaalDepartment of Psychology, Brain & Cognition, University of Amsterdam, 1000 GG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6628-4534
Linda GeerligsDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sander E BoschDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6845-0911
Marcel A J van GervenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual representations can be generated via feedforward or feedback processes. The extent to which these processes result in overlapping representations remains unclear. Previous work has shown that imagined stimuli elicit similar representations as perceived stimuli throughout the visual cortex. However, while representations during imagery are indeed only caused by feedback processing, neural processing during perception is an interplay of both feedforward and feedback processing. This means that any representational overlap could be because of overlap in feedback processes. In the current study, we aimed to investigate this issue by characterizing the overlap between feedforward- and feedback-initiated category representations during imagined stimuli, conscious perception, and unconscious processing using fMRI in humans of either sex. While all three conditions elicited stimulus representations in left lateral occipital cortex (LOC), significant similarities were observed only between imagery and conscious perception in this area. Furthermore, connectivity analyses revealed stronger connectivity between frontal areas and left LOC during conscious perception and in imagery compared with unconscious processing. Together, these findings can be explained by the idea that long-range feedback modifies visual representations, thereby reducing representational overlap between purely feedforward- and feedback-initiated stimulus representations measured by fMRI. Neural representations influenced by feedback, either stimulus driven (perception) or purely internally driven (imagery), are, however, relatively similar.

Indexed as

Visual CortexConsciousnessFeedbackHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingOccipital LobeVisual Perceptionconsciousnessmental imageryperceptionunconscious processing

Identifiers

PMID34593516
PMCPMC8577044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.