Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593513›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2021

Nudging toward vaccination: a systematic review.

Mark Donald C Reñosa, Jeniffer Landicho, Jonas Wachinger, Sarah L Dalglish, Kate Bärnighausen, Till Bärnighausen, Shannon A McMahon

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07161739 (Vaccination Nudges Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07161739 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Vaccination Nudges Project: Behavioural Nudges From Pharmacists to Increase Influenza and Travel Vaccination Uptake: A Pragmatic Randomized Control Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2025 to 2026Enrolled20,000ConditionsStroke, Influenza Human, Influenza Vaccines, Health Behavior ChangeArmsBehavioural Nudge (Influenza Risk Reduction), Behavioural Nudge (Travel Vaccination Benefit)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Interventions for COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Reminders, but not monetary incentives, increase COVID-19 booster uptake.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark Donald C ReñosaHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany drmarkdonaldrn@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7414-7174
Jeniffer LandichoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-4261-9296
Jonas WachingerHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5480-3138
Sarah L DalglishInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7218-5193
Kate BärnighausenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4466-8921
Till BärnighausenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4182-4212
Shannon A McMahonHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8634-9283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccine hesitancy (VH) and the global decline of vaccine coverage are a major global health threat, and novel approaches for increasing vaccine confidence and uptake are urgently needed. 'Nudging', defined as altering the environmental context in which a decision is made or a certain behaviour is enacted, has shown promising results in several health promotion strategies. We present a comprehensive synthesis of evidence regarding the value and impact of nudges to address VH.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review to determine if nudging can mitigate VH and improve vaccine uptake. Our search strategy used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and non-MeSH terms to identify articles related to nudging and vaccination in nine research databases. 15 177 titles were extracted and assessed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The final list of included articles was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework.

findingsIdentified interventions are presented according to a framework for behaviour change, MINDSPACE. Articles (n=48) from 10 primarily high-income countries were included in the review. Nudging-based interventions identified include using reminders and recall, changing the way information is framed and delivered to an intended audience, changing the messenger delivering information, invoking social norms and emotional affect (eg, through storytelling, dramatic narratives and graphical presentations), and offering incentives or changing defaults. The most promising evidence exists for nudges that offer incentives to parents and healthcare workers, that make information more salient or that use trusted messengers to deliver information. The effectiveness of nudging interventions and the direction of the effect varies substantially by context. Evidence for some approaches is mixed, highlighting a need for further research, including how successful interventions can be adapted across settings.

conclusionNudging-based interventions show potential to increase vaccine confidence and uptake, but further evidence is needed for the development of clear recommendations. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic increases the urgency of undertaking nudging-focused research. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020185817.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHealth PersonnelHumansSARS-CoV-2Vaccinationhealth policypublic healthsystematic reviewvaccines

Identifiers

PMID34593513
PMCPMC8487203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.