Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593503›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2021

Assessment of difference in postpartum depression among caesarean and vaginally delivered women at 6-week follow-up in hospitals in Pune District, India: an observational cohort study.

Prakash P Doke, Varsha Mahesh Vaidya, Arvinder Pal Singh Narula, Manjiri Chaitanya Datar, Archana Vasantrao Patil, Tushar Madhav Panchanadikar, Girija Narendrakumar Wagh

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mode of Delivery and Postpartum Depression: A Cohort Study.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Prakash P DokeCommunity Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune, India.
Varsha Mahesh VaidyaCommunity Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune, India.
Arvinder Pal Singh NarulaCommunity Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune, India arvindernarula@rediffmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2265-1934
Manjiri Chaitanya DatarDepartment of Psychiatry, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune, India.
Archana Vasantrao PatilPublic Health, Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai, India.
Tushar Madhav PanchanadikarObstetrics and Gynaecology, Bharat Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune, Maharastra, India.
Girija Narendrakumar WaghObstetrics and Gynaecology, Bharat Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune, Maharastra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the proportion of postpartum depression at 6 weeks among women who had caesarean delivery and women who had vaginal delivery and to assess its association with some sociodemographic factors.

designThis is a descriptive comparative study with prospective enrolment. We followed the enrolled women and assessed them for postpartum depression 6 weeks after delivery.

settingWe conducted the study in Pune District, India from July 2017 to December 2018. The study sites were all non-teaching government hospitals performing five or more caesarean sections per month and two teaching hospitals: one government and one private.

participantsWe included in the study group women who have undergone caesarean section in the participating hospitals and were residents of Pune District. Women who delivered vaginally and matched in age and parity were included in the comparison group. We followed 1556 women in each group.

main outcome measuresAn Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score of 10 or more for each woman was the primary outcome. χ

resultsThe proportion of postpartum depression at 6 weeks was 3.79% among women who had caesarean delivery and 2.35% among those who had vaginal delivery (χ

conclusionsWe conclude that young women particularly those who had caesarean delivery should be screened 6 weeks after delivery.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumAdultCesarean SectionCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalsHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornPregnancyProspective Studiesdepression & mood disordersepidemiologymaternal medicinemental healthpublic health

Identifiers

PMID34593503
PMCPMC8487184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.