Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593482›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2021

Postnatal exercise interventions: a systematic review of adherence and effect.

Edward Mullins, Shalini Sharma, Alison H McGregor

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06975397 (The Effect of Kinesio Taping on Reducing Diastasis Recti Abdominis Size in Postpartum Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06975397 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Kinesio Taping on Reducing Diastasis Recti Abdominis Size in Postpartum Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorProskura PatrycjaRan2020 to 2021Enrolled161ConditionsDiastasis Recti Abdominis (DRA)ArmsEXERCISE TRAINING WITH OR WITHOUT MEDICATION, kinesio taping
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Can Group Exercise Programs Improve Health Outcomes in Pregnant Women? An Updated Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edward MullinsDepartment of Metabolism, Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK edward.mullins@ic.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1886-6358
Shalini SharmaLeicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
Alison H McGregorSurgery, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBImperial College London · GBLeicester Royal Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate adherence to and effect of postnatal physical activity (PA) interventions.

designSystematic review of PA intervention randomised controlled trials in postnatal women. The initial search was carried out in September 2018, and updated in January 2021. DATA SOURCES: Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases, hand-searching references of included studies. The 25 identified studies included 1466 postnatal women in community and secondary care settings. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were included if the PA interventions were commenced and assessed in the postnatal year. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted using a prespecified extraction template and assessed independently by two reviewers using Cochrane ROB 1 tool.

results1413 records were screened for potential study inclusion, full-text review was performed on 146 articles, 25 studies were included. The primary outcome was adherence to PA intervention. The secondary outcomes were the effect of the PA interventions on the studies' specified primary outcome. We compared effect on primary outcome for supervised and unsupervised exercise interventions. Studies were small, median n=66 (20-130). PA interventions were highly variable, targets for PA per week ranged from 60 to 275 min per week. Loss to follow-up (LTFU) was higher (14.5% vs 10%) and adherence to intervention was lower (73.6% vs 86%) for unsupervised versus supervised studies.

conclusionsStudies of PA interventions inconsistently reported adherence and LTFU. Where multiple studies evaluated PA as an outcome, they had inconsistent effects, with generally low study quality and high risk of bias. Agreement for effect between studies was evident for PA improving physical fitness and reducing fatigue. Three studies showed no adverse effect of PA on breast feeding. High-quality research reporting adherence and LTFU is needed into how and when to deliver postnatal PA interventions to benefit postnatal physical and mental health. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019114836.

Indexed as

ExerciseExercise TherapyFatigueFemaleHumansMental HealthPhysical Fitnessobstetricspublic healthsports medicine

Identifiers

PMID34593482
PMCPMC8487169
OpenAlexW3201811541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.