Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2021
Post-discharge after surgery Virtual Care with Remote Automated Monitoring-1 (PVC-RAM-1) technology versus standard care: randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Post Discharge After Surgery Virtual Care With Remote Automated Monitoring Technology (PVC-RAM) Trial
Using Personalized Risk and Digital Tools to Guide Transitions Following Acute Kidney Events - Virtual Care: Virtual Home Hospital With Remote Monitoring to Reduce Acute Care Hospitalization
Pragmatic Pilot Study of SKH@Home Post-discharge Monitoring Initiative on Outcomes of Surgical Patients
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of remote biometric sensing on readmission risk and mortality after hospital discharge: Insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Pooled it
- PeriOperative Quality Initiative (POQI) international consensus statement on perioperative arterial pressure management.British journal of anaesthesia · 2024Guideline
- Digital Health Interventions and Patient Safety in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Readiness for implementation of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: a systematic review and clinical innovation network analysis.The Lancet. Digital health · 2023Pooled it
- Short-stay compared to long-stay admissions for loop ileostomy reversals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Pooled it
- Alert burden when monitoring patients' vital signs continuously at home.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Virtual Care Remuneration Policy and Postdischarge Follow-Up Trends.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Recovery Experiences of Older Adults and Their Caregivers After Major Elective Noncardiac Surgery.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Digital alert fatigue and escalation behaviours in nurse-led remote postoperative care: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Day Surgery With Remote Patient Monitoring for Acute Cholecystitis: Economic Modeling Study.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2025Article
- Use and Application of mHealth Technologies in Perioperative Surgical Care: Narrative Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Review
- Impact of Telemedicine on Health Expenditures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan: Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Review
- Perioperative Monitoring: Beyond Arterial Blood Pressure and Beyond the Operating Room.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2025Article
- Use of Digital and Telemedicine Tools for Postoperative Pain Management at Home: A Scoping Review of Health Professionals' Roles and Clinical Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Impact of Virtual Care With Remote Automated Monitoring on the Rate of Acute Hospital Care Post Discharge and Index Length of Hospital Stay: Protocol for the Post Discharge After Surgery Virtual Care With Remote Automated Monitoring Technology 3 (PVC-RAM-3) Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- The legal and socioeconomic considerations of spine telemedicine in Canada.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2025Review
- Days at home after surgery as a perioperative outcome: scoping review and recommendations for use in health services research.The British journal of surgery · 2024Article
- Telemedicine-medical "snack community"-PHS ecosystem: Insights into the double-edged sword role of telemedicine in clinical practice and medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- Effect of continuous nursing on rehabilitation of older patients with joint replacement after discharge.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
63 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine if virtual care with remote automated monitoring (RAM) technology versus standard care increases days alive at home among adults discharged after non-elective surgery during the covid-19 pandemic.
designMulticentre randomised controlled trial.
setting8 acute care hospitals in Canada.
participants905 adults (≥40 years) who resided in areas with mobile phone coverage and were to be discharged from hospital after non-elective surgery were randomised either to virtual care and RAM (n=451) or to standard care (n=454). 903 participants (99.8%) completed the 31 day follow-up.
interventionParticipants in the experimental group received a tablet computer and RAM technology that measured blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, temperature, and body weight. For 30 days the participants took daily biophysical measurements and photographs of their wound and interacted with nurses virtually. Participants in the standard care group received post-hospital discharge management according to the centre's usual care. Patients, healthcare providers, and data collectors were aware of patients' group allocations. Outcome adjudicators were blinded to group allocation.
main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was days alive at home during 31 days of follow-up. The 12 secondary outcomes included acute hospital care, detection and correction of drug errors, and pain at 7, 15, and 30 days after randomisation.
resultsAll 905 participants (mean age 63.1 years) were analysed in the groups to which they were randomised. Days alive at home during 31 days of follow-up were 29.7 in the virtual care group and 29.5 in the standard care group: relative risk 1.01 (95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.02); absolute difference 0.2% (95% confidence interval -0.5% to 0.9%). 99 participants (22.0%) in the virtual care group and 124 (27.3%) in the standard care group required acute hospital care: relative risk 0.80 (0.64 to 1.01); absolute difference 5.3% (-0.3% to 10.9%). More participants in the virtual care group than standard care group had a drug error detected (134 (29.7%)
conclusionVirtual care with RAM shows promise in improving outcomes important to patients and to optimal health system function.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04344665.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.