Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593083›Full record

ReviewBJPsych open2021

Randomised controlled trials of antidepressant and anti-anxiety medications for people with autism spectrum disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shoumitro Deb, Meera Roy, Rachel Lee, Madiha Majid, Bharati Limbu, Jacopo Santambrogio, Ashok Roy, Marco O Bertelli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJPsych open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Shoumitro DebDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1300-8103
Meera RoyDepartment of Psychiatry, Hereford and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust, UK.
Rachel LeeDepartment of Learning Disabilities, Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Madiha MajidWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, UK.
Bharati LimbuDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK.
Jacopo SantambrogioClinical Neuroscience PhD program, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy.
Ashok RoyWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8432-981X
Marco O BertelliResearch and Clinical Centre, San Sebastiano Foundation of the Misericordia of Florence, Italy.
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBCoventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITWorcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough widely used, the current evidence for the efficacy of antidepressant and anti-anxiety medications for people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is limited and conflicting.

aimsWe carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of these medications in people with ASD.

methodWe searched the following databases: Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, DARE and ClinicalTrials.gov. Additionally, we hand-searched 11 relevant journals. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Jadad score to assess the quality of each included study. We carried out a meta-analysis using a random effects model.

resultsWe included 15 randomised controlled trials (13 on antidepressants and two on anti-anxiety medications) for a total of 958 people with ASD. Data showed contradictory findings among the studies, with larger studies mostly showing a non-significant difference in outcomes between the treatment and the placebo groups. Meta-analysis of pooled Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale and Clinical Global Impression Scale data from nine studies (60%) did not show any statistically significant inter-group difference on either of the outcome measures. The adverse effects reported were mild and, in most studies, their rates did not show any significant inter-group difference.

conclusionsGiven the methodological flaws in the most included studies and contradictory findings, it is difficult to draw any definitive conclusion about the effectiveness of either antidepressant or anti-anxiety medications to treat either ASD core symptoms or associated behaviours. Robust, large-scale, randomised controlled trials are needed to address this issue.

Indexed as

anti-anxiety medicationsantidepressantsAutism spectrum disordermeta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34593083
PMCPMC8503912
OpenAlexW3203855182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.