Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593023›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2021

Experimental evidence for opposing effects of high deer density on tick-borne pathogen prevalence and hazard.

Sara Gandy, Elizabeth Kilbride, Roman Biek, Caroline Millins, Lucy Gilbert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Spatial and seasonal determinants of Lyme borreliosis incidence in France, 2016 to 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sara GandyInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. sara.gandy@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2579-4479
Elizabeth KilbrideInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Roman BiekInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Caroline MillinsInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Lucy GilbertInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
University of Glasgow · GBJames Hutton Institute · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying the mechanisms driving disease risk is challenging for multi-host pathogens, such as Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.), the tick-borne bacteria causing Lyme disease. Deer are tick reproduction hosts but do not transmit B. burgdorferi s.l., whereas rodents and birds are competent transmission hosts. Here, we use a long-term deer exclosure experiment to test three mechanisms for how high deer density might shape B. burgdorferi s.l. prevalence in ticks: increased prevalence due to higher larval tick densities facilitating high transmission on rodents (M1); alternatively, reduced B. burgdorferi s.l. prevalence because more larval ticks feed on deer rather than transmission-competent rodents (dilution effect) (M2), potentially due to ecological cascades, whereby higher deer grazing pressure shortens vegetation which decreases rodent abundance thus reducing transmission (M3).

methodsIn a large enclosure where red deer stags were kept at high density (35.5 deer km

resultsPrevalence tended to be lower, though not conclusively so, in high deer density plots compared to exclosures (predicted prevalence of 1.0% vs 2.2%), suggesting that the dilution and cascade mechanisms might outweigh the increased opportunities for transmission mechanism. Presence of deer at high density led to shorter vegetation and fewer rodents, consistent with an ecological cascade. However, Lyme disease hazard (density of infected I. ricinus nymphs) was five times higher in high deer density plots due to tick density being 18 times higher.

conclusionsHigh densities of tick reproduction hosts such as deer can drive up vector-borne disease hazard, despite the potential to simultaneously reduce pathogen prevalence. This has implications for environmental pathogen management and for deer management, although the impact of intermediate deer densities now needs testing.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionAnimalsBorrelia burgdorferiDeerFemaleIxodesLarvaLyme DiseaseMalePrevalenceRodentiaScotlandTick InfestationsVector Borne DiseasesBorrelia burgdorferi sensu latoDilution effectEcological cascadesIxodes ricinusLyme disease

Identifiers

PMID34593023
PMCPMC8485466
OpenAlexW3139190121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.