Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34593015›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of therapist-guided internet-delivered behaviour therapy for children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome: study protocol for a single-blind randomised controlled trial.

Per Andrén, Lorena Fernández de la Cruz, Kayoko Isomura, Fabian Lenhard, Charlotte L Hall, E Bethan Davies, Tara Murphy, Chris Hollis, Filipa Sampaio, Inna Feldman and 4 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03916055 (Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Internet-delivered Behaviour Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Tourette's Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03916055 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Internet-delivered Behaviour Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Tourette's Disorder: a Single-blind Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2019 to 2022Enrolled221ConditionsTourette's Disorder, Persistent (Chronic) Motor or Vocal Tic DisorderArmsExposure and response prevention (ERP), Education on tics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Tic Disorders Care Gaps in Spanish-Speaking Latin America.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Per AndrénCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden. per.andren@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1358-0166
Lorena Fernández de la CruzCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kayoko IsomuraCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fabian LenhardCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden.
Charlotte L HallInstitute of Mental Health, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
E Bethan DaviesInstitute of Mental Health, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Tara MurphyUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Chris HollisInstitute of Mental Health, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Filipa SampaioDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Inna FeldmanDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Matteo BottaiUnit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eva SerlachiusCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erik AnderssonCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden.
David Mataix-ColsCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Gävlegatan 22, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Nottingham · GBUppsala University · SEGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GB

Funding

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd 2017-01066Region Stockholm (ALF) 20180093Vetenskapsrådet 2018-00344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment guidelines recommend behaviour therapy (BT) for patients with Tourette syndrome (TS) and chronic tic disorder (CTD). However, BT is rarely accessible due to limited availability of trained therapists and long travel distances to specialist clinics. Internet-delivered BT has the potential of overcoming these barriers through remote delivery of treatment with minimal therapist support. In the current protocol, we outline the design and methods of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating an internet-delivered BT programme referred to as BIP TIC. The trial's primary objective is to determine the clinical efficacy of BIP TIC for reducing tic severity in young people with TS/CTD, compared with an active control intervention. Secondary objectives are to investigate the 12-month durability of the treatment effects and to perform a health economic evaluation of the intervention.

methodsIn this single-blind superiority RCT, 220 participants (9-17 years) with TS/CTD throughout Sweden will be randomised to 10-12 weeks of either therapist-supported internet-delivered BT based on exposure with response prevention (BIP TIC) or therapist-supported internet-delivered education. Data will be collected at baseline, 3 and 5 weeks into the treatment, at post-treatment, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. The primary endpoint is the 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome is tic severity as measured by the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale - Total Tic Severity Score. Treatment response is operationalised as scores of "Very much improved" or "Much improved" on the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale, administered at the primary endpoint. Outcome assessors will be blind to treatment condition at all assessment points. A health economic evaluation of BIP TIC will be performed, both in the short term (primary endpoint) and the long term (12-month follow-up). There are no planned interim analyses. DISCUSSION: Participant recruitment started on 26 April 2019 and finished on 9 April 2021. The total number of included participants was 221. The final participant is expected to reach the primary endpoint in September 2021 and the 12-month follow-up in June 2022. Data analysis for the primary objective will commence after the last participant reaches the primary endpoint.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03916055 . Registered on 16 April 2019.

Indexed as

Tourette SyndromeAdolescentBehavior TherapyChildCost-Benefit AnalysisEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansInternetRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeBehaviour therapyExposure with response prevention, Internet-based interventions, Self-helpTic disordersTicsTourette syndrome

Identifiers

PMID34593015
PMCPMC8481317
OpenAlexW3197140647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.