Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34592900›Full record

ReviewBioengineered2021

Yeasts in nanotechnology-enabled oral vaccine and gene delivery.

Elena Ivanova

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineered, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Design of an oral vaccine againstThe veterinary quarterly · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Vaccines · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena IvanovaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral vaccine and gene delivery systems must be engineered to withstand several different physiological environments, such as those present in the oral cavity, stomach, and jejunum, each of which exhibits varying pH levels and enzyme distributions. Additionally, these systems must be designed to ensure appropriate gastrointestinal absorption and tissue/cellular targeting properties. Yeasts-based delivery vehicles are excellent candidates for oral vaccine and oral gene therapies as many species possess cellular characteristics resulting in enhanced resistance to the harsh gastrointestinal (GI) environment and facilitated passage across the mucosal barrier. Yeast capsules can stimulate and modulate host immune responses, which is beneficial for vaccine efficacy. In addition, recombinant modification of yeasts to express cell penetrating proteins and injection mechanisms along with efficient cell adhering capabilities can potentially improve transfection rates of genetic material. In this literature review, we present evidence supporting the beneficial role yeast-based delivery systems can play in increasing the efficacy of oral administration of vaccines and gene therapies.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanostructuresSaccharomyces cerevisiaeVaccinesVaccinesgene deliverynanoparticlesOral vaccinessynthetic yeast

Identifiers

PMID34592900
PMCPMC8806958
OpenAlexW3203629442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.