Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34592839›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2021

Modular component exchange and outcome of DAIR for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection : a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Maxime Gerritsen, Abdullah Khawar, Henk Scheper, Robert van der Wal, Jan Schoones, Mark de Boer, Rob Nelissen, Bart Pijls

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Current Clinical Challenges.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maxime GerritsenDept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Abdullah KhawarDept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Henk ScheperDept of Infectious Disease, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Robert van der WalDept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jan SchoonesDirectorate of Research Policy (formerly: Walaeus Library), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Mark de BoerDept of Infectious Disease, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rob NelissenDept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Bart PijlsDept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5351-5057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the association between exchange of modular parts in debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedure and outcomes for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

methodsWe conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library from inception until May 2021. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regression was used to estimate, on a study level, the success rate of DAIR related to component exchange. Risk of bias was appraised using the (AQUILA) checklist.

resultsWe included 65 studies comprising 6,630 patients. The pooled overall success after DAIR for PJI was 67% (95% confidence interval (CI) 63% to 70%). This was 70% (95% CI 65% to 75%) for DAIR for hip PJI and 63% (95% CI 58% to 69%) for knee PJI. In studies before 2004 (n = 27), our meta-regression analysis showed a 3.5% increase in success rates for each 10% increase in component exchange in DAIR for hip PJI and a 3.1% increase for each 10% increase in component exchange for knee PJI. When restricted to studies after 2004 (n = 37), this association changed: for DAIR for hip PJI a decrease in successful outcome by 0.5% for each 10% increase in component exchange and for DAIR for knee PJI this was a 0.01% increase in successful outcome for each 10% increase in component exchange.

conclusionThis systematic review and meta-regression found no benefit of modular component exchange on reduction of PJI failure. This limited effect should be weighed against the risks for the patient and cost on a case-by-case basis. The association between exchange of modular components and outcome changed before and after 2004. This suggests the effect seen after 2004 may reflect a more rigorous, evidence-based, approach to the infected implant compared to the years before.

Indexed as

DAIRdebridementdebridement, antibiotics, and implant retentionhipsknee periprosthetic joint infectionkneeslower limb arthroplastiesModular component exchangePeriprosthetic joint infectionPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI)randomized controlled trialsregression analysisrevision arthroplastiesTotal joint replacement

Identifiers

PMID34592839
PMCPMC8558449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.