ReviewCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2021
Implementing Biological Pacemakers: Design Criteria for Successful.
Review in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomechanical Isolation is Required for Maintenance of the Cardiac Pacemaker Cell Fate.Research square · 2026Article
- Odz4 upregulates SAN-specific genes to promote differentiation into cardiac pacemaker-like cells.FEBS letters · 2025Article
- Review
- Transient pacing in pigs with complete heart block via myocardial injection of mRNA coding for the T-box transcription factor 18.Nature biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Differentiation of Sinoatrial-like Cardiomyocytes as a Biological Pacemaker Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Pacemaker Channels and the Chronotropic Response in Health and Disease.Circulation research · 2024Review
- Mechanistic insight into the functional role of human sinoatrial node conduction pathways and pacemaker compartments heterogeneity: A computer model analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Local tissue mechanics control cardiac pacemaker cell embryonic patterning.Life science alliance · 2023Article
- Article
- Novel Insights into the Sinoatrial Node in Single-Cell RNA Sequencing: From Developmental Biology to Physiological Function.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Each heartbeat that pumps blood throughout the body is initiated by an electrical impulse generated in the sinoatrial node (SAN). However, a number of disease conditions can hamper the ability of the SAN's pacemaker cells to generate consistent action potentials and maintain an orderly conduction path, leading to arrhythmias. For symptomatic patients, current treatments rely on implantation of an electronic pacing device. However, complications inherent to the indwelling hardware give pause to categorical use of device therapy for a subset of populations, including pediatric patients or those with temporary pacing needs. Cellular-based biological pacemakers, derived in vitro or in situ, could function as a therapeutic alternative to current electronic pacemakers. Understanding how biological pacemakers measure up to the SAN would facilitate defining and demonstrating its advantages over current treatments. In this review, we discuss recent approaches to creating biological pacemakers and delineate design criteria to guide future progress based on insights from basic biology of the SAN. We emphasize the need for long-term efficacy in vivo via maintenance of relevant proteins, source-sink balance, a niche reflective of the native SAN microenvironment, and chronotropic competence. With a focus on such criteria, combined with delivery methods tailored for disease indications, clinical implementation will be attainable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.