Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34592753›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Predicting next-day discharge via electronic health record access logs.

Xinmeng Zhang, Chao Yan, Bradley A Malin, Mayur B Patel, You Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparative Analysis of Fusion Strategies for Imaging and Non-imaging Data - Use-case of Hospital Discharge Prediction.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinmeng ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Chao YanDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6719-1388
Bradley A MalinDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Mayur B PatelSection of Surgical Sciences, Departments of Surgery & Neurosurgery, Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency General Surgery, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
You ChenDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8232-8840

Funding

Discovering Care Coordination Practice Patterns in the EMR: Interpretation and Impact on Patient OutcomesR01LM012854 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHEN, YOU · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
NIH HHS GM120484NIH HHS GM120484, HL111111, R01AG058639NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHospital capacity management depends on accurate real-time estimates of hospital-wide discharges. Estimation by a clinician requires an excessively large amount of effort and, even when attempted, accuracy in forecasting next-day patient-level discharge is poor. This study aims to support next-day discharge predictions with machine learning by incorporating electronic health record (EHR) audit log data, a resource that captures EHR users' granular interactions with patients' records by communicating various semantics and has been neglected in outcome predictions. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study focused on the EHR data for all adults admitted to Vanderbilt University Medical Center in 2019. We learned multiple advanced models to assess the value that EHR audit log data adds to the daily prediction of discharge likelihood within 24 h and to compare different representation strategies. We applied Shapley additive explanations to identify the most influential types of user-EHR interactions for discharge prediction.

resultsThe data include 26 283 inpatient stays, 133 398 patient-day observations, and 819 types of user-EHR interactions. The model using the count of each type of interaction in the recent 24 h and other commonly used features, including demographics and admission diagnoses, achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve of 0.921 (95% CI: 0.919-0.923). By contrast, the model lacking user-EHR interactions achieved a worse AUROC of 0.862 (0.860-0.865). In addition, 10 of the 20 (50%) most influential factors were user-EHR interaction features.

conclusionEHR audit log data contain rich information such that it can improve hospital-wide discharge predictions.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient DischargeAdultHospitalizationHumansMachine LearningROC Curvedaily discharge predictionEHR audit logshospital capacity managementuser-EHR interactions

Identifiers

PMID34592753
PMCPMC8633668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.