Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34592682›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2021

High throughput and quantitative enzymology in the genomic era.

D A Mokhtari, M J Appel, P M Fordyce, D Herschlag

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Protein dynamics: The future is bright and complicated!Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D A MokhtariDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
M J AppelDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
P M FordyceDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA; ChEM-H Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA; Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA; Chan Zuckerberg Biohub San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA. Electronic address: pfordyce@stanford.edu.
D HerschlagDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA; Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA; ChEM-H Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Electronic address: herschla@stanford.edu.

Funding

Study of Nonenzymatic and Enzymatic Phosphoryl TransferR01GM064798 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Polly Morrell Fordyce, DANIEL HERSCHLAG · 2002 to 2026
$5.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate predictions from models based on physical principles are the ultimate metric of our biophysical understanding. Although there has been stunning progress toward structure prediction, quantitative prediction of enzyme function has remained challenging. Realizing this goal will require large numbers of quantitative measurements of rate and binding constants and the use of these ground-truth data sets to guide the development and testing of these quantitative models. Ground truth data more closely linked to the underlying physical forces are also desired. Here, we describe technological advances that enable both types of ground truth measurements. These advances allow classic models to be tested, provide novel mechanistic insights, and place us on the path toward a predictive understanding of enzyme structure and function.

Indexed as

GenomicsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysics

Identifiers

PMID34592682
PMCPMC8648990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.