ArticleInternational journal of cardiology2021
Proteomic profiles of patients with atrial fibrillation provide candidate biomarkers for diagnosis.
Article in International journal of cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of glycolytic metabolic pathways in cardiovascular disease and potential therapeutic approaches.Basic research in cardiology · 2023Review
- Effects of Electrical Remodeling on Atrial Fibrillation in Diabetes Mellitus.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Proteins and pathways in atrial fibrillation and atrial cardiomyopathy underlying cryptogenic stroke.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Article
- Platelet-Derived Drug Targets and Biomarkers of Ischemic Stroke-The First Dynamic Human LC-MS Proteomic Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Proteomics: A promising approach to discover new biomarkers for atrial fibrillation.International journal of cardiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide with an increasing risk of heart failure, stroke, and thromboembolic events. Currently distinct pathophysiological mechanisms during AF development and valuable biomarkers for AF management remain unknown.
methodsIn this study, we collected peripheral plasma samples from 18 non-valvular AF patients and 10 controls. A LC-MS/MS-DIA-based quantitative proteomic analysis, as well as bioinformatic analysis, was performed for discovery of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) and dysregulated pathways. Next, we utilized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to validate selected DEPs and assessed their abilities for discrimination in another group of 20 AF patients and 10 controls.
resultsThe plasma proteome provided evidence for vital roles of abnormal inflammation, hemostasis, tissue remodeling and metabolism in AF patients. Differences between paroxysmal and persistent AF mainly lie in proteins or pathways related to hemostasis and cardiac remodeling. In addition, we successfully validated up-regulated proteins of platelet factor 4 variant 1 (PF4V1), thrombospondin-1 (THBS1), platelet basic protein (PBP) and fructose-bisphosphate aldolase A (ALDOA) in another group, which could make discrimination between AF patients and controls.
conclusionsOur pilot proteomic study provided candidate biomarkers of PF4V1, THBS1, PBP and ALODA with the hope of application in AF management. And we showed the differences in pathophysiological mechanisms between paroxysmal and persistent AF. They mainly focused on pathways of hemostasis and cardiac remodeling, which could be a valuable clue for further research on AF progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.