Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34592085›Full record

ArticleChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.)2021

Pilot Study of a Patient Experience with an ELLIPTA Inhaler Electronic Medication Monitor and Associated Integrated System: A Prospective Observational Study Using the COPD Patient-Powered Research Network.

Barbara P Yawn, Gretchen M McCreary, John A Linnell, Cara B Pasquale, Elisha Malanga, Radmila Choate, David A Stempel, Rahul Gondalia, Leanne Kaye, Kathryn A Collison and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Digital remote maintenance inhaler adherence interventions in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara P YawnCOPD Foundation, Miami, Florida, United States.
Gretchen M McCrearyCOPD Foundation, Miami, Florida, United States.
John A LinnellCOPD Foundation, Miami, Florida, United States.
Cara B PasqualeCOPD Foundation, Miami, Florida, United States.
Elisha MalangaCOPD Foundation, Miami, Florida, United States.
Radmila ChoateCOPD Foundation, Miami, Florida, United States.
David A StempelRespiratory Therapy Area, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States.
Rahul GondaliaPropeller Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.
Leanne KayePropeller Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.
Kathryn A CollisonRespiratory Therapy Area, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States.
Benjamin S WuRespiratory Therapy Area, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States.
Daniel GratieRespiratory Therapy Area, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States.
Richard H StanfordRespiratory Therapy Area, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States.
Ryan TomlinsonRespiratory Therapy Area, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States.
COPD Foundation · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline HO-18-19715/210024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic medication monitors (EMMs) are associated with decreased rescue inhaler use, symptom burden, and increased medication adherence in asthma. However, the use of EMMs in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using the ELLIPTA dry powder inhaler has not been studied.

methodsThis was an open-label, single-arm, prospective observational study of EMMs and associated application (app) use over 12 weeks and up to 24 weeks (April-October 2019) in people with self-reported COPD aged ≥40 years enrolled in the COPD Patient-Powered Research Network, using an ELLIPTA inhaler. The primary outcome was daily active use of the app over 12 weeks. Treatment adherence, rescue inhaler use, and participant satisfaction were assessed over the same period.

resultsAmong the 122 participants, mean (standard deviation [SD]) proportion of days participants opened the app was 59.5% (31.4), 51.1% (33.5) and 41.3% (34.2) for Days 1-30, 31-60 and 61-90, respectively. Mean (SD) adherence to maintenance medication remained stable: 80.2% (22.7) and 79.9% (26.7) for Days 1-30 and 61-90, respectively. In participants using a rescue inhaler and EMM, mean (SD) rescue-free days increased from 18.5 (10.0; Days 1-30, n=51) to 21.4 (9.6; Days 61-90, n=48). Participants reported high levels of confidence in using the EMM, valued app reminders highly and reported high system satisfaction (mean [SD] scale: 1=low, 5=high; 4.6 [1.1], 4.3 [1.1] and 4.1 [1.1], respectively).

conclusionsUse of an ELLIPTA EMM with frequent app engagement, high participant satisfaction and decreased rescue medication use may aid COPD management.

Indexed as

chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasedry powder inhalerelectronic medication monitorELLIPTAreal-world

Identifiers

PMID34592085
PMCPMC8686856
OpenAlexW3200718912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.