Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34591924›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Burden of invasive group B Streptococcus disease in non-pregnant adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adoración Navarro-Torné, Daniel Curcio, Jennifer C Moïsi, Luis Jodar

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence of Group BMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Descriptive review: global spectrum of invasive group B streptococcal disease in nonpregnant adults: epidemiology, risk factors and clinical presentations.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessment of Clinical Significance of MolecularOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A murine model of adult gastrointestinal colonization by Group BbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genomic characterization of group BMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  14. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Revisiting typing systems for group BMicrobial genomics · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adoración Navarro-TornéPfizer Spain, Madrid, Spain.
Daniel CurcioPfizer Spain, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3387-2433
Jennifer C MoïsiPfizer France, Paris, France.
Luis JodarPfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStreptococcus agalactiae or group B Streptococcus (GBS) has emerged as an important cause of invasive disease in adults, particularly among the elderly and those with underlying comorbidities. Traditionally, it was recognised as an opportunistic pathogen colonising and causing disease in pregnant women, neonates, and young infants. Reasons for the upsurge of invasive GBS (iGBS) among the elderly remain unclear, although it has been related to risk factors such as underlying chronic diseases, immunosenescence, impaired inflammatory response, and spread of virulent clones. Antibiotics are successfully as treatment or prophylaxis against iGBS. Several candidate vaccines against iGBS are under development.

objectivesTo conduct a systematic review of the current literature on invasive GBS in order to determine disease incidence and case fatality ratio (CFR) among non-pregnant adults. Additionally, information on risk factors, clinical presentation, serotype distribution, and antimicrobial resistance was also retrieved.

methodsBetween January and June 2020, electronic searches were conducted in relevant databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, and SCOPUS. Studies were included in the systematic review if they met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The authors assessed the selected studies for relevance, risk of bias, outcome measures, and heterogeneity. Meta-analyses on incidence and CFR were conducted after evaluating the quality of methods for assessment of exposure and outcomes.

resultsPooled estimates of iGBS incidence in non-pregnant adults 15 years and older were 2.86 cases per 100.000 population (95% CI, 1.68-4.34). Incidence rates in older adults were substantially higher, 9.13 (95%CI, 3.53-17.22) and 19.40 (95%CI, 16.26-22.81) per 100.000 population ≥50 and ≥ 65 years old, respectively. Incidence rates ranged from 0.40 (95% CI, 0.30-0.60) in Africa to 5.90 cases per 100.000 population (95% CI, 4.30-7.70) in North America. The overall CFR was and 9.98% (95% CI, 8.47-11.58). CFR was highest in Africa at 22.09% (95% CI, 12.31-33.57). Serotype V was the most prevalent serotype globally and in North America accounting for 43.48% (n = 12926) and 46,72% (n = 12184) of cases, respectively. Serotype Ia was the second and serotype III was more prevalent in Europe (25.0%) and Asia (29.5%). Comorbidities were frequent among non-pregnant adult iGBS cases. Antimicrobial resistance against different antibiotics (i.e., penicillin, erythromycin) is increasing over time.

conclusionsThis systematic review revealed that iGBS in non-pregnant adults has risen in the last few years and has become a serious public health threat especially in older adults with underlying conditions. Given the current serotype distribution, vaccines including serotypes predominant among non-pregnant adults (i.e., serotypes V, Ia, II, and III) in their formulation are needed to provide breadth of protection. Continued surveillance monitoring potential changes in serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance patterns are warranted to inform public health interventions.

Indexed as

Streptococcus agalactiaeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGlobal Burden of DiseaseHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceStreptococcal InfectionsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34591924
PMCPMC8483371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.