Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34591919›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Aerosol SARS-CoV-2 in hospitals and long-term care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Gary Mallach, Samantha B Kasloff, Tom Kovesi, Anand Kumar, Ryan Kulka, Jay Krishnan, Benoit Robert, Michaeline McGuinty, Sophia den Otter-Moore, Bashour Yazji and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the workplace: Key findings from a rapid review of the literature.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 Genome in the Indoor Air and High-Touch Surfaces.International journal of environmental research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Gary MallachWater and Air Quality Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0927-592X
Samantha B KasloffNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
Tom KovesiChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0521-8936
Anand KumarSections of Critical Care Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Departments of Medicine, Medical Microbiology and Pharmacology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Ryan KulkaWater and Air Quality Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Jay KrishnanNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
Benoit RobertDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Michaeline McGuintyDepartment of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Sophia den Otter-MooreFaculty of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Bashour YazjiDepartment of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Todd CuttsNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAPublic Health Agency of Canada · CAHealth Canada · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have quantified aerosol concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 in hospitals and long-term care homes, and fewer still have examined samples for viability. This information is needed to clarify transmission risks beyond close contact.

methodsWe deployed particulate air samplers in rooms with COVID-19 positive patients in hospital ward and ICU rooms, rooms in long-term care homes experiencing outbreaks, and a correctional facility experiencing an outbreak. Samplers were placed between 2 and 3 meters from the patient. Aerosol (small liquid particles suspended in air) samples were collected onto gelatin filters by Ultrasonic Personal Air Samplers (UPAS) fitted with <2.5μm (micrometer) and <10 μm size-selective inlets operated for 16 hours (total 1.92m3), and with a Coriolis Biosampler over 10 minutes (total 1.5m3). Samples were assayed for viable SARS-CoV-2 virus and for the viral genome by multiplex PCR using the E and N protein target sequences. We validated the sampling methods by inoculating gelatin filters with viable vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), and with three concentrations of viable SARS-CoV-2, operating personal samplers for 16hrs, and quantifying viable virus recovery by TCID50 assay.

resultsIn total, 138 samples were collected from 99 rooms. RNA samples were positive in 9.1% (6/66) of samples obtained with the UPAS 2.5μm samplers, 13.5% (7/52) with the UPAS 10μm samplers, and 10.0% (2/20) samples obtained with the Coriolis samplers. Culturable virus was not recovered in any samples. Viral RNA was detected in 15.1% of the rooms sampled. There was no significant difference in viral RNA recovery between the different room locations or samplers. Method development experiments indicated minimal loss of SARS-CoV-2 viability via the personal air sampler operation.

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyAerosolsAnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsCOVID-19HospitalsHumansLong-Term CareRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Vero CellsAerosolsRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID34591919
PMCPMC8483369
OpenAlexW3204646187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.