Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34591894›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Comparison of methods for pre-processing, exosome isolation, and RNA extraction in unpasteurized bovine and human milk.

Sanoji Wijenayake, Shafinaz Eisha, Zoya Tawhidi, Michael A Pitino, Michael A Steele, Alison S Fleming, Patrick O McGowan

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanoji WijenayakeCenter for Environmental Epigenetics and Development, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shafinaz EishaCenter for Environmental Epigenetics and Development, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zoya TawhidiCenter for Environmental Epigenetics and Development, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael A PitinoDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael A SteeleDepartment of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Alison S FlemingDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Patrick O McGowanCenter for Environmental Epigenetics and Development, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5459-5976
University of Toronto · CAUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Milk is a highly complex, heterogeneous biological fluid that contains non-nutritive, bioactive extracellular vesicles called exosomes. Characterization of milk-derived exosomes (MDEs) is challenging due to the lack of standardized methods that are currently being used for milk pre-processing, storage, and exosome isolation. In this study, we tested: 1) three pre-processing methods to remove cream, fat, cellular debris, and casein proteins from bovine milk to determine whether pre-processing of whole milk prior to long-term storage improves MDE isolations, 2) the suitability of two standard exosome isolation methods for MDE fractionation, and 3) four extraction protocols for obtaining high quality RNA from bovine and human MDEs. MDEs were characterized via Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA), and western immunoblotting for CD9, CD63, and Calnexin protein markers. We also present an optimized method of TEM sample preparation for MDEs. Our results indicate that: 1) Removal of cream and fat globules from unpasteurized bovine milk, prior to long-term storage, improves the MDE yield but not purity, 2) Differential ultracentrifugation (DUC) combined with serial filtration is better suited for bovine MDE isolation compared to ExoQuick (EQ) combined with serial filtration, however both methods were comparable for human milk, and 3) TRIzol LS is better suited for RNA extraction from bovine MDEs isolated by EQ and DUC methods. 4) TRIzol LS, TRIzol+RNA Clean and Concentrator, and TRIzol LS+RNA Clean and Concentrator methods can be used for RNA extractions from human MDEs isolated by EQ, yet the TRIzol LS method is better suited for human MDEs isolated by DUC. The QIAzol + miRNeasy Mini Kit produced the lowest RNA yield for bovine and human MDEs.

Indexed as

Fractional PrecipitationUltracentrifugationAnimalsCattleExosomesFemaleFiltrationHumansMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionMilkMilk, HumanRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID34591894
PMCPMC8483318
OpenAlexW3201864539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.