Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34591869›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Evaluation of electrostatic sprayers and foggers for the application of disinfectants in the era of SARS-CoV-2.

Joseph P Wood, Matthew Magnuson, Abderrahmane Touati, Jerome Gilberry, Jonathan Sawyer, Timothy Chamberlain, Stella McDonald, David Hook

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph P WoodOffice of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6316-9418
Matthew MagnusonOffice of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Abderrahmane TouatiJacobs Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jerome GilberryJacobs Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jonathan SawyerJacobs Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
Timothy ChamberlainJacobs Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
Stella McDonaldJacobs Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
David HookJacobs Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jacobs (United States) · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

EPA 68HERC20D0018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although research has shown that the COVID-19 disease is most likely caused by airborne transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, disinfection of potentially contaminated surfaces is also recommended to limit the spread of the disease. Use of electrostatic sprayers (ESS) and foggers to rapidly apply disinfectants over large areas or to complex surfaces has emerged with the COVID-19 pandemic. ESSs are designed to impart an electrostatic charge to the spray droplets with the goal of increasing deposition of the droplets onto surfaces, thereby promoting more efficient use of the disinfectant. The purpose of this research was to evaluate several spray parameters for different types of sprayers and foggers, as they relate to the application of disinfectants. Some of the parameters evaluated included the spray droplet size distribution, the electrostatic charge, the ability of the spray to wrap around objects, and the loss of disinfectant chemical active ingredient due to the spray process. The results show that most of the devices evaluated for droplet size distribution had an average volume median diameter ≥ 40 microns, and that four out of the six ESS tested for charge/mass produced sprays of at least 0.1 mC/kg. A minimal wrap-around effect of the spray deposition onto a cylindrical object was observed. The loss of disinfectant active ingredient to the air due to spraying was minimal for the two disinfectants tested, and concurrently, the active ingredient concentrations of the liquid disinfectants sprayed and collected 3 feet (1 meter) away from the spray nozzle do not decrease.

Indexed as

COVID-19DisinfectantsDisinfectionEquipment DesignHumansSARS-CoV-2Static ElectricitySurface PropertiesDisinfectants

Identifiers

PMID34591869
PMCPMC8483385
OpenAlexW3204517882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.