Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34591239›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue banking2021

The estimated risk of SARS-CoV- 2 infection via cornea transplant in Canada.

Sheila F O'Brien, Antoine Lewin, Qi-Long Yi, Graeme Dowling, Etienne Fissette, Steven J Drews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sheila F O'BrienEpidemiology and Surveillance, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada. sheila.obrien@blood.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5332-2789
Antoine LewinMedical Affairs and Innovation, Héma-Québec, Saint-Laurent, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1748-4198
Qi-Long YiEpidemiology and Surveillance, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Graeme DowlingComprehensive Tissue Centre, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton Alberta, Canada.
Etienne FissetteMedical Affairs and Innovation, Héma-Québec, Québec, QC, Canada.
Steven J DrewsMicrobiology, Canadian Blood Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In late 2019 the respiratory illness, Corona Virus Disease-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus emerged in China and quickly spread to other countries. The primary mode of transmission is person-to-person via respiratory droplets. SARS-CoV-2 has been identified in conjunctiva. Transmission by cornea transplant has not been reported but is theoretically possible. We aimed to estimate the possible risk of transmission in Canada via cornea transplant during the first wave of the pandemic, and the potential risk reduction from testing decedents. We constructed a deterministic model in which the risk of transmission was estimated as the product of three proportions: decedents with SARS-CoV-2 infection, corneas that are NAT positive, and NAT positive corneas presumed to transmit. Risk was estimated according to 3 scenarios: most likely, optimistic and pessimistic. At the peak of the first wave of the pandemic risk was estimated to be 1 in 63,031 cornea transplants in Canada but could be as low as 1 in 175,821 or as high as 1 in 10,129. It would take 16 years at the peak infection of the first wave of the pandemic to observe 1 transmission. Testing would reduce the risk of 1 in 63,031 to 1 in 210,104 assuming 70% test sensitivity. The theoretical risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission by cornea transplant is extremely low and decedent testing is unlikely to be beneficial.

Indexed as

COVID-19ChinaCorneaHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2CanadaCornea transplantCOVID-19RiskSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34591239
PMCPMC8481755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.