Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34591127›Full record

SynthesisCalcified tissue international2022

Effects of Orthogeriatric Care Models on Outcomes of Hip Fracture Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Annelore Van Heghe, Gilles Mordant, Jolan Dupont, Marian Dejaeger, Michaël R Laurent, Evelien Gielen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Calcified tissue international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Impact of orthogeriatric care: prescription patterns in hospitalized older adults.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The impact of pre- versus postoperative geriatric consultation in elderly patients with hip fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Risk Factors and Causes of Delayed Hip Fracture Surgery in Elderly Patients: Findings from a Hip Fracture Fast-Track Surgery Program.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annelore Van HegheFaculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gilles MordantInstitute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1821-5168
Jolan DupontGerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5336-2791
Marian DejaegerGerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7289-1397
Michaël R LaurentCentre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9681-8330
Evelien GielenGerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. evelien.gielen@uzleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-8985-1201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orthogeriatrics is increasingly recommended in the care of hip fracture patients, although evidence for this model is conflicting or at least limited. Furthermore, there is no conclusive evidence on which model [geriatric medicine consultant service (GCS), geriatric medical ward with orthopedic surgeon consultant service (GW), integrated care model (ICM)] is superior. The review summarizes the effect of orthogeriatric care for hip fracture patients on length of stay (LOS), time to surgery (TTS), in-hospital mortality, 1-year mortality, 30-day readmission rate, functional outcome, complication rate, and cost. Two independent reviewers retrieved randomized controlled trials, controlled observational studies, and pre/post analyses. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Thirty-seven studies were included, totaling 37.294 patients. Orthogeriatric care significantly reduced LOS [mean difference (MD) - 1.55 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) (- 2.53; - 0.57)], but heterogeneity warrants caution in interpreting this finding. Orthogeriatrics also resulted in a 28% lower risk of in-hospital mortality [95%CI (0.56; 0.92)], a 14% lower risk of 1-year mortality [95%CI (0.76; 0.97)], and a 19% lower risk of delirium [95%CI (0.71; 0.92)]. No significant effect was observed on TTS and 30-day readmission rate. No consistent effect was found on functional outcome. Numerically lower numbers of complications were observed in orthogeriatric care, yet some complications occurred more frequently in GW and ICM. Limited data suggest orthogeriatrics is cost-effective. There is moderate quality evidence that orthogeriatrics reduces LOS, in-hospital mortality, 1-year mortality, and delirium of hip fracture patients and may reduce complications and cost, while the effect on functional outcome is inconsistent. There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend one or the other type of orthogeriatric care model.

Indexed as

GeriatricsHip FracturesAgedHumansLength of StayTreatment OutcomeGeriatric co-managementHip fractureMeta-analysisOrthogeriatricsOsteoporosisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34591127
PMCPMC8784368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.