Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34591023›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Remote Patient Monitoring and Incentives to Support Smoking Cessation Among Pregnant and Postpartum Medicaid Members: Three Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies.

Caroline M Joyce, Kathryn Saulsgiver, Salini Mohanty, Chethan Bachireddy, Carin Molfetta, Mary Steffy, Alice Yoder, Alison M Buttenheim

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03209557 (Pilot Trial Testing Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using SmokeBeat to Monitor and Increase Smoking Abstinence in Pregnant Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03209557 nacompletednot on this map

Pilot Trial Testing Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using SmokeBeat to Monitor and Increase Smoking Abstinence in Pregnant Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2017 to 2019Enrolled32ConditionsTobacco Use Cessation, Pregnancy RelatedArmsSmartWatch SmokeBeat Application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. A Scoping Review and Meta-analysis of the Use of Remote Biochemical Verification Methods of Smoking Status in Tobacco Research.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caroline M JoyceDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4798-9488
Kathryn SaulsgiverBetterUp, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7419-0992
Salini MohantyDepartment of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7610-6467
Chethan BachireddySchool of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8855-5769
Carin MolfettaPenn Medicine Lancaster General Health, Lancaster, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1952-435X
Mary SteffyPenn Medicine Lancaster General Health, Lancaster, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7250-5601
Alice YoderPenn Medicine Lancaster General Health, Lancaster, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5042-3429
Alison M ButtenheimDepartment of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2432-1637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoking rates among low-income individuals, including those eligible for Medicaid, have not shown the same decrease that is observed among high-income individuals. The rate of smoking among pregnant women enrolled in Medicaid is almost twice that among privately insured women, which leads to significant disparities in birth outcomes and a disproportionate cost burden placed on Medicaid. Several states have identified maternal smoking as a key target for improving birth outcomes and reducing health care expenditures; however, efficacious, cost-effective, and feasible cessation programs have been elusive.

objectiveThis study aims to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a smartwatch-enabled, incentive-based smoking cessation program for Medicaid-eligible pregnant smokers.

methodsPilot 1 included a randomized pilot study of smartwatch-enabled remote monitoring versus no remote monitoring for 12 weeks. Those in the intervention group also received the SmokeBeat program. Pilot 2 included a randomized pilot study of pay-to-wear versus pay-to-quit for 4 weeks. Those in a pay-to-wear program could earn daily incentives for wearing the smartwatch, whereas those in pay-to-quit program could earn daily incentives if they wore the smartwatch and abstained from smoking. Pilot 3, similar to pilot 2, had higher incentives and a duration of 3 weeks.

resultsFor pilot 1 (N=27), self-reported cigarettes per week among the intervention group declined by 15.1 (SD 27) cigarettes over the study; a similar reduction was observed in the control group with a decrease of 17.2 (SD 19) cigarettes. For pilot 2 (N=8), self-reported cigarettes per week among the pay-to-wear group decreased by 43 cigarettes (SD 12.6); a similar reduction was seen in the pay-to-quit group, with an average of 31 (SD 45.6) fewer cigarettes smoked per week. For pilot 3 (N=4), one participant in the pay-to-quit group abstained from smoking for the full study duration and received full incentives.

conclusionsDecreases in smoking were observed in both the control and intervention groups during all pilots. The use of the SmokeBeat program did not significantly improve cessation. The SmokeBeat program, remote cotinine testing, and remote delivery of financial incentives were considered feasible and acceptable. Implementation challenges remain for providing evidence-based cessation incentives to low-income pregnant smokers. The feasibility and acceptability of the SmokeBeat program were moderately high. Moreover, the feasibility and acceptability of remote cotinine testing and the remotely delivered contingent financial incentives were successful.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03209557; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03209557.

Indexed as

financial incentivesincentivesmaternal smokingmHealthmobile healthmobile phonepostpartumpregnantsmart devicessmokingsmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID34591023
PMCPMC8517817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.