ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2021
Three-dimensional assessment of pharyngeal airway in individuals with myotonic dystrophy type 1
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: The objectives of this study were to assess pharyngeal airway volume (PAV) in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) by cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) and to evaluate the impact of diaphragm thickness and pulmonary function tests on PAV. Materials and methods: Thirty DM1 patients (10 female and 20 male; mean age 42.40 ± 12.07) were included in the study. Age and sex-matched thirty patients were participated as control group. In DM1 group pulmonary function tests (PFT) were performed. Independent t-test was used to compare PAV values of patients with DM1 and control group. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the parameters according to sex ( p < 0.05). Pearson and Spearman correlation tests were used to evaluate the relationships between parameters of DM1 patients (p < 0.05). A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to explain the PAV with parameters that showed positive correlation with PAV. Results: Age of onset and disease duration were 22.37 ± 8.45 and 20.03 ± 12.08, respectively, in patients with DM1. PAV values of control group were significantly lower than DM1 group ( p < 0.001). Forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced volume vital capacity values were higher in males than females in DM1 group according to sex ( p < 0.001). PAV values were greater in male patients than females of the DM1 group ( p = 0.022). Diaphragm thickness in DM1 group after inspiration and expiration were 2.60 ± 0.65 and 1.94 ± 0.40, respectively. According to the regression analysis, DTai and FVC were significantly explained the PAV. Conclusion: PAV was higher in DM1 group. There was a significant positive correlation between diaphragm thickness, pulmonary functions, and PAVs of DM1 patients. The amount of the PAV was mostly influenced by DTai and FVC. It is recommended to evaluate the PAV in patients with DM1 because of impaired respiratory functions and pharyngeal muscle involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.