Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34590790›Full record

ReviewNursing open2022

Facilitators of person and relationship-centred care in nursing.

Tony Ryan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nursing open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. [Communication as a strategic tool for person-centered care].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tony RyanDivision of Nursing & Midwifery, Health Sciences Scholl, Faculty of Medicine Dentistry & Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8549-3101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo provide an expert overview on the current state of evidence as it relates to person and relationship-centred care.

designReview and commentary.

methodsThe paper was prepared in order to contribute to a Consensus Development Project. It is based upon a scoping review with additional theoretical material used to supplement the narrative. The content is limited to that person and relationship-centred literature as it relates to nursing practice and policy.

resultsThere is compelling evidence in favour of nurses pursuing person and relationship-centred policies and practices. Organizational and individual factors contribute to the successful implementation of person and relationship-centred care. These include conditions that enable nurses to provide high-quality care (resources, clinical supervision and security) and include training and development, a biographical approach to care and those care environments centred on innovation and person-centred care processes.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CarePreceptorshipHumansNarrationnursingperson-centred carerelationship-centred care

Identifiers

PMID34590790
PMCPMC8859070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.