Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34590608›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

Renal and Salivary Gland Functions after Three Cycles of PSMA-617 Therapy Every Four Weeks in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Tim Wollenweber, Lucia Zisser, Elisabeth Kretschmer-Chott, Michael Weber, Bernhard Grubmüller, Gero Kramer, Shahrokh F Shariat, Markus Mitterhauser, Stefan Schmitl, Chrysoula Vraka and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Comparative Analysis of Morphological and Functional Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tim WollenweberDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Lucia ZisserDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Elisabeth Kretschmer-ChottDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Michael WeberDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of General Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Bernhard GrubmüllerDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Gero KramerDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Markus MitterhauserDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3173-5272
Stefan SchmitlDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Chrysoula VrakaDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2065-6093
Alexander R HaugDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8308-6174
Marcus HackerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4222-4083
Markus HartenbachDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Sazan RasulDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2898-3232

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background[

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical, renal, and salivary scintigraphy data and salivary [

resultsIn total, 54 PSMA PET scans, 98 kidney, and 98 salivary scintigraphy results were evaluated. There were no significant differences for the ejection fraction, peak time, and residual activity after 5 min for both parotid and submandibular glands prior to each cycle and 4 weeks after the last cycle. Similarly, no significant differences in serum creatinine and renal scintigraphy parameters were observed prior to each cycle and 4 weeks after the last treatment. Despite there being no changes in the metabolic volume of both submandibular glands, SUVmax values dropped significantly (

conclusionResults evidenced no alterations in renal function and only minimal impairment of salivary function of mCRPC patients who acquired an intense PSMA-RLT regimen every 4 weeks.

Indexed as

Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAgedDipeptidesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesSalivary GlandsDipeptidesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingProstate-Specific AntigenPSMA-617RadiopharmaceuticalsmCRPCprostate cancerPSMArenal scintigraphysalivary scintigraphy

Identifiers

PMID34590608
PMCPMC8482282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.