Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34590295›Full record

ReviewBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2021

Brief history of biofertilizers in Brazil: from conventional approaches to new biotechnological solutions.

Catharine Abreu Bomfim, Lucas Gabriel Ferreira Coelho, Helson Mario Martins do Vale, Ieda de Carvalho Mendes, Manuel Megías, Francisco Javier Ollero, Fábio Bueno Dos Reis Junior

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Use of beneficial microorganisms in bean cultivation: strategies employed to increase productivity.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Commercial and on-farm microbial bioinputs production systems: challenges, opportunities and current Brazilian regulatory framework.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Parameter evaluation for developing phosphate-solubilizing Bacillus inoculants.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catharine Abreu BomfimEmbrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7313-1157
Lucas Gabriel Ferreira CoelhoEmbrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1649-6218
Helson Mario Martins do ValeDepartment of Phytopathology, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, 70910-900, Brazil. helson@unb.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5452-3873
Ieda de Carvalho MendesEmbrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4011-7997
Manuel MegíasDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Francisco Javier OlleroDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3641-7946
Fábio Bueno Dos Reis JuniorEmbrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-177X

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação Araucária 043/2019INCT-Plant-Growth Promoting Microorganisms for Agricultural Sustainability and Environmental Responsibility 465133/2014-2Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of the Spanish government AGL2016-77163-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brazil has a long history of research with rhizobia and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Currently, the use of bio-based products in Brazil, containing microorganisms that are effective in promoting plant growth through various mechanisms, is already a consolidated reality for the cultivation of several crops of agricultural interest. This is due to the excellent results obtained over many years of research, which contributed to reinforce the use of rhizobia and PGPR by farmers. The high quality of the products offered, containing elite strains, allows the reduction and prevention in the use of mineral fertilization, contributing to low-cost and sustainable agriculture. Currently, research has turned its efforts in the search for new products that further increase the efficiency of those already available on the market and for new formulations or inoculation strategies that contribute to greater productivity and efficiency of these products. In this review, the history of biological products for main crops of agricultural interest and the new biotechnologies and research available in the agricultural market are discussed.

Indexed as

AgricultureBiotechnologyFertilizersBrazilFertilizersAzospirillumBradyrhizobiumInoculantPGPRRhizobia

Identifiers

PMID34590295
PMCPMC8578473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.