ArticleNeotropical entomology2021
Field Efficacy of Metarhizium rileyi Applications Against Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Maize.
Article in Neotropical entomology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biocontrol of Fall Armyworm Larvae by Selected MexicanInsects · 2025Article
- Oleic Acid and Linoleic Acid Enhances the Biocontrol Potential ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Genetic Diversity and Virulence Variation ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Utilization ofFrontiers in fungal biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficacy of the fungus Metarhizium rileyi (Farlow) Kepler, S. A. Rehner & Humber (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) against the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and the impact on the community of epigeans predators as well as the natural occurrence of native fungal strains were evaluated after sequential sprays in maize. In the first season, the infestation was lower than 0.2 larvae per plant throughout the three fungal sprays and no significant difference was observed in the number of infected larvae among treatments. In the second season, insect population reached an average of 0.8 larvae per plant between the second and third sprays and the number of larvae succumbed by M. rileyi was higher in fungal-treated plots in the following weeks. Molecular characterization of the collected isolates on mummified larvae revealed the introduction of a new isolate did not eliminate the native strain on the fungal-treated plots. In both seasons, the diversity and abundance of predator species in the plots were not affected by any of the treatments. We showed that applications of selected strains of M. rileyi early in the season have no significant impact on the occurrence of natural enemies in maize.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34590294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.